2021•PubMedOpen access

Approach to Traumatic Diaphragm Injuries: Single Center Experience.

Mustafa Şentürk, Murat Çakır, Muhammed Ali Akbulut, Kerim Yeşildağ

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traumatic diaphragm injuries are rare. After blunt trauma, injuries occur with a 1-7% rate. This rate increases up to 15% in penetrating injuries. Diagnosis may be diffi cult and imaging tests may be misleading. The misdiagnosis may lead to herniated abdominal organs towards the intrathoracic cavity, with a mortality rate between 30% and 60%. This study was designed to investigate the data of patients operated for diaphragmatic injury in our clinic. METHODS: The files of trauma patients admitted to our hospital between 2014-2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The files of cases with diaphragmatic injury were examined. Patients were evaluated in terms of age, sex, type of injury, localization, additional organ injuries, grade, surgical method, and mortality. Values were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were included in the study. Of the patients, 7 were female and 13 were male. The mean age was 32.7 (17-52) years. Of the cases, 10 were with stab wounds while 4 were incar traffi c accidents and 6 were gunshot wounds. Although all patients had thoracoabdominal injuries, 4 patients had additional pelvic injuries. Of the cases, 14 were accompanied with lung injury while 5 with intestinal, 4 with the spleen, 3 with liver, and 2 with cardiovascular injury. Patients with intestinal resection performed had a longer hospitalization period than others. When the severity of the injury was evaluated, grade 3 injuries were detected most commonly, whereas 3 patients had grade 1, 2, and 4 injuries. Grade 5 injury was detected in 1 patient. Primary repair was performed in 18 patients and mesh repair was performed in 2 patients. In three cases, the repair was performed with a thoracic way. One patient died on the postoperative fi rst day. CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragmatic injuries that may be missed during imaging may be damaged with many organs. Diaphragmatic injuries should be kept in mind in the upper abdominal and thoracic injuries.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Traumatic diaphragm injuries are rare. After blunt trauma, injuries occur with a 1-7% rate. This rate increases up to 15% in penetrating injuries. Diagnosis may be diffi cult and imaging tests may be misleading. The misdiagnosis may lead to herniated abdominal organs towards the intrathoracic cavity, with a mortality rate between 30% and 60%. This study was designed to investigate the data of patients operated for diaphragmatic injury in our clinic. METHODS: The files of trauma patients admitted to our hospital between 2014-2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The files of cases with diaphragmatic injury were examined. Patients were evaluated in terms of age, sex, type of injury, localization, additional organ injuries, grade, surgical method, and mortality. Values were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were included in the study. Of the patients, 7 were female and 13 were male. The mean age was 32.7 (17-52) years. Of the cases, 10 were with stab wounds while 4 were incar traffi c accidents and 6 were gunshot wounds. Although all patients had thoracoabdominal injuries, 4 patients had additional pelvic injuries. Of the cases, 14 were accompanied with lung injury while 5 with intestinal, 4 with the spleen, 3 with liver, and 2 with cardiovascular injury. Patients with intestinal resection performed had a longer hospitalization period than others. When the severity of the injury was evaluated, grade 3 injuries were detected most commonly, whereas 3 patients had grade 1, 2, and 4 injuries. Grade 5 injury was detected in 1 patient. Primary repair was performed in 18 patients and mesh repair was performed in 2 patients. In three cases, the repair was performed with a thoracic way. One patient died on the postoperative fi rst day. CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragmatic injuries that may be missed during imaging may be damaged with many organs. Diaphragmatic injuries should be kept in mind in the upper abdominal and thoracic injuries.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Traumatic diaphragm injuries are rare. After blunt trauma, injuries occur with a 1-7% rate. This rate increases up to 15% in penetrating injuries. Diagnosis may be diffi cult and imaging tests may be misleading. The misdiagnosis may lead to herniated abdominal organs towards the intrathoracic cavity, with a mortality rate between 30% and 60%. This study was designed to investigate the data of patients operated for diaphragmatic injury in our clinic. METHODS: The files of trauma patients admitted to our hospital between 2014-2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The files of cases with diaphragmatic injury were examined. Patients were evaluated in terms of age, sex, type of injury, localization, additional organ injuries, grade, surgical method, and mortality. Values were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were included in the study. Of the patients, 7 were female and 13 were male. The mean age was 32.7 (17-52) years. Of the cases, 10 were with stab wounds while 4 were incar traffi c accidents and 6 were gunshot wounds. Although all patients had thoracoabdominal injuries, 4 patients had additional pelvic injuries. Of the cases, 14 were accompanied with lung injury while 5 with intestinal, 4 with the spleen, 3 with liver, and 2 with cardiovascular injury. Patients with intestinal resection performed had a longer hospitalization period than others. When the severity of the injury was evaluated, grade 3 injuries were detected most commonly, whereas 3 patients had grade 1, 2, and 4 injuries. Grade 5 injury was detected in 1 patient. Primary repair was performed in 18 patients and mesh repair was performed in 2 patients. In three cases, the repair was performed with a thoracic way. One patient died on the postoperative fi rst day. CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragmatic injuries that may be missed during imaging may be damaged with many organs. Diaphragmatic injuries should be kept in mind in the upper abdominal and thoracic injuries.

Key concepts: Medicine, Surgery, Trauma center, Blunt, Diaphragm (acoustics), Penetrating trauma, Diaphragmatic breathing, Mortality rate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Approach to Traumatic Diaphragm Injuries: Single Center Experience. — Research Paper | ScholarLens