2020TECHNOLOGYRequires access

Universal method for fabricating PDMS microfluidic device using SU8, 3D printing and soft lithography

Charmi Chande, Nida Riaz, Victoria Harbour, Hathija Noor, Monica Torralba, Yu‐Hsuan Cheng, Zhenglong Li, Anh Tong, Roman S. Voronov, Sagnik Basuray

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

Microfluidic devices are constructed from polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) due to their biocompatibility, fabrication ease, well-established protocols, and simplicity. PDMS-based microfluidic devices are constructed by (i) applying liquid PDMS to a negative mold (usually a silicon or 3D-printed mold) and (ii) curing the PDMS with heat exposure over a set time period. Unreacted resin monomers in 3D-printed molds prevent PDMS from fully curing, resulting in improper channel formation in PDMS and reducing the PDMS device’s efficacy. An in-house protocol that uses SU-8 as a “non-stick” coating on 3D-printed molds facilitates the successful casting of PDMS. Contact angle, surface profile, optical profile, and force testing prove that PDMS cast from SU-8-treated molds resembles pristine PDMS, unlike PDMS cast from untreated molds. Further, this method is generalized to commercial 3D prints using different 3D printing resins. To demonstrate this technique’s viability in microfluidic devices, a microfluidic tree using PDMS from treated 3D prints shows vibrant colors and clear lines. This is absent from an untreated PDMS.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Microfluidic devices are constructed from polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) due to their biocompatibility, fabrication ease, well-established protocols, and simplicity. PDMS-based microfluidic devices are constructed by (i) applying liquid PDMS to a negative mold (usually a silicon or 3D-printed mold) and (ii) curing the PDMS with heat exposure over a set time period. Unreacted resin monomers in 3D-printed molds prevent PDMS from fully curing, resulting in improper channel formation in PDMS and reducing the PDMS device’s efficacy. An in-house protocol that uses SU-8 as a “non-stick” coating on 3D-printed molds facilitates the successful casting of PDMS. Contact angle, surface profile, optical profile, and force testing prove that PDMS cast from SU-8-treated molds resembles pristine PDMS, unlike PDMS cast from untreated molds. Further, this method is generalized to commercial 3D prints using different 3D printing resins. To demonstrate this technique’s viability in microfluidic devices, a microfluidic tree using PDMS from treated 3D prints shows vibrant colors and clear lines. This is absent from an untreated PDMS.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Microfluidic devices are constructed from polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) due to their biocompatibility, fabrication ease, well-established protocols, and simplicity. PDMS-based microfluidic devices are constructed by (i) applying liquid PDMS to a negative mold (usually a silicon or 3D-printed mold) and (ii) curing the PDMS with heat exposure over a set time period. Unreacted resin monomers in 3D-printed molds prevent PDMS from fully curing, resulting in improper channel formation in PDMS and reducing the PDMS device’s efficacy. An in-house protocol that uses SU-8 as a “non-stick” coating on 3D-printed molds facilitates the successful casting of PDMS. Contact angle, surface profile, optical profile, and force testing prove that PDMS cast from SU-8-treated molds resembles pristine PDMS, unlike PDMS cast from untreated molds. Further, this method is generalized to commercial 3D prints using different 3D printing resins. To demonstrate this technique’s viability in microfluidic devices, a microfluidic tree using PDMS from treated 3D prints shows vibrant colors and clear lines. This is absent from an untreated PDMS.

Key concepts: Polydimethylsiloxane, PDMS stamp, Materials science, Microfluidics, Mold, Fabrication, Soft lithography, Curing (chemistry)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Universal method for fabricating PDMS microfluidic device using SU8, 3D printing and soft lithography — Research Paper | ScholarLens