2021PubMedRequires access

Intravenous iron infusion and newer non-dextran formulations.

Tim Aung, J.R. Coleman, Peter W Davidson, David J. Hetzel, Sandy Tin Aung

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

There are several newer intravenous iron formulations to treat iron deficiency and its anaemia. Its use in the primary care setting has been infrequent compared to tertiary centres, due to historical concerns such as anaphylaxis. There is a lack of overall comparison among the intravenous formulations of iron. Compared to oral iron therapy, the newer intravenous formulations, which allow a complete or near-complete replacement in a single sitting of 15-30 minutes, have an improved safety profile with better tolerability, efficacy and effectiveness. They are suited for administration in the primary care setting. The four non-dextran formulations (ferric carboxymaltose, iron sucrose, iron isomaltoside and ferumoxytol) share an equal or near equal efficacy and safety profile. This article also outlines how to provide iron infusion safely and effectively in the community.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There are several newer intravenous iron formulations to treat iron deficiency and its anaemia. Its use in the primary care setting has been infrequent compared to tertiary centres, due to historical concerns such as anaphylaxis. There is a lack of overall comparison among the intravenous formulations of iron. Compared to oral iron therapy, the newer intravenous formulations, which allow a complete or near-complete replacement in a single sitting of 15-30 minutes, have an improved safety profile with better tolerability, efficacy and effectiveness. They are suited for administration in the primary care setting. The four non-dextran formulations (ferric carboxymaltose, iron sucrose, iron isomaltoside and ferumoxytol) share an equal or near equal efficacy and safety profile. This article also outlines how to provide iron infusion safely and effectively in the community.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There are several newer intravenous iron formulations to treat iron deficiency and its anaemia. Its use in the primary care setting has been infrequent compared to tertiary centres, due to historical concerns such as anaphylaxis. There is a lack of overall comparison among the intravenous formulations of iron. Compared to oral iron therapy, the newer intravenous formulations, which allow a complete or near-complete replacement in a single sitting of 15-30 minutes, have an improved safety profile with better tolerability, efficacy and effectiveness. They are suited for administration in the primary care setting. The four non-dextran formulations (ferric carboxymaltose, iron sucrose, iron isomaltoside and ferumoxytol) share an equal or near equal efficacy and safety profile. This article also outlines how to provide iron infusion safely and effectively in the community.

Key concepts: Medicine, Iron sucrose, Ferumoxytol, Intravenous iron, Tolerability, Safety profile, Iron deficiency, Adverse effect

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intravenous iron infusion and newer non-dextran formulations. — Research Paper | ScholarLens