2021viXraRequires access

Irrationality Proofs: From e to Zeta(n>=2)

Timothy W. Jones

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

We develop definitions and a theory for convergent series that have terms of the form 1/a_j where a_j is an integer greater than one and the series convergence point is less than one. These series have terms with denominators that can be used as number bases. The series for e-2 and z_n=\zeta(n)-1 are of this type. Further, both series yield number bases that can represent all possible rational convergence points as single digits. As partials for these series are rational numbers, all partials can be given as single decimals using some a_j as a base. In the case of e-2, the last term of a partial yields such a base and partials form systems of nesting inequalities yielding a proof of the irrationality of e-2. In the case of z_n, using the z_2 case we determine that such systems of nesting inequalities are not formed, but we discover partials require bases greater than the denominator of their last term. We prove this for the general z_n and using it we give a proof of the irrationality of all z_n.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We develop definitions and a theory for convergent series that have terms of the form 1/a_j where a_j is an integer greater than one and the series convergence point is less than one. These series have terms with denominators that can be used as number bases. The series for e-2 and z_n=\zeta(n)-1 are of this type. Further, both series yield number bases that can represent all possible rational convergence points as single digits. As partials for these series are rational numbers, all partials can be given as single decimals using some a_j as a base. In the case of e-2, the last term of a partial yields such a base and partials form systems of nesting inequalities yielding a proof of the irrationality of e-2. In the case of z_n, using the z_2 case we determine that such systems of nesting inequalities are not formed, but we discover partials require bases greater than the denominator of their last term. We prove this for the general z_n and using it we give a proof of the irrationality of all z_n.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We develop definitions and a theory for convergent series that have terms of the form 1/a_j where a_j is an integer greater than one and the series convergence point is less than one. These series have terms with denominators that can be used as number bases. The series for e-2 and z_n=\zeta(n)-1 are of this type. Further, both series yield number bases that can represent all possible rational convergence points as single digits. As partials for these series are rational numbers, all partials can be given as single decimals using some a_j as a base. In the case of e-2, the last term of a partial yields such a base and partials form systems of nesting inequalities yielding a proof of the irrationality of e-2. In the case of z_n, using the z_2 case we determine that such systems of nesting inequalities are not formed, but we discover partials require bases greater than the denominator of their last term. We prove this for the general z_n and using it we give a proof of the irrationality of all z_n.

Key concepts: Mathematics, Series (stratigraphy), Mathematical proof, Irrationality, Base (topology), Term (time), Integer (computer science), Combinatorics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Irrationality Proofs: From e to Zeta(n>=2) — Research Paper | ScholarLens