2020IFAC-PapersOnLineOpen access

The ℓ1—Exact Penalty-Barrier Phase for Degenerate Nonlinear Programming Problems in Ipopt

David M. Thierry, Lorenz T. Biegler

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

Failure to satisfy Constraint Qualifications (CQs) leads to serious convergence difficulties for state-of-the-art Nonlinear Programming (NLP) solvers. Since this failure is often overlooked by practitioners, a strategy to enhance the robustness properties for problems without CQs is vital. Inspired by penalty merit functions and barrier-like strategies, we propose and implement a combination of both in Ipopt. This strategy has the advantage of consistently satisfying the Linear Independence Constraint Qualification (LICQ) for an augmented problem, readily enabling regular step computations within the interior-point framework. Additionally, an update rule inspired by the work of Byrd et al. (2012) is implemented, which provides a dynamic increase of the penalty parameter as stationary points are approached. Extensive test results show favorable performance and robustness increases for our ℓ1 —penalty strategies, when compared to the regular version of Ipopt. Moreover, a dynamic optimization problem with nonsmooth dynamics formulated as a Mathematical Program with Complementarity Constraints (MPCC) was solved in a single optimization stage without additional reformulation. Thus, this ℓ1— strategy has proved useful for a broad class of degenerate NLPs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Failure to satisfy Constraint Qualifications (CQs) leads to serious convergence difficulties for state-of-the-art Nonlinear Programming (NLP) solvers. Since this failure is often overlooked by practitioners, a strategy to enhance the robustness properties for problems without CQs is vital. Inspired by penalty merit functions and barrier-like strategies, we propose and implement a combination of both in Ipopt. This strategy has the advantage of consistently satisfying the Linear Independence Constraint Qualification (LICQ) for an augmented problem, readily enabling regular step computations within the interior-point framework. Additionally, an update rule inspired by the work of Byrd et al. (2012) is implemented, which provides a dynamic increase of the penalty parameter as stationary points are approached. Extensive test results show favorable performance and robustness increases for our ℓ1 —penalty strategies, when compared to the regular version of Ipopt. Moreover, a dynamic optimization problem with nonsmooth dynamics formulated as a Mathematical Program with Complementarity Constraints (MPCC) was solved in a single optimization stage without additional reformulation. Thus, this ℓ1— strategy has proved useful for a broad class of degenerate NLPs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Failure to satisfy Constraint Qualifications (CQs) leads to serious convergence difficulties for state-of-the-art Nonlinear Programming (NLP) solvers. Since this failure is often overlooked by practitioners, a strategy to enhance the robustness properties for problems without CQs is vital. Inspired by penalty merit functions and barrier-like strategies, we propose and implement a combination of both in Ipopt. This strategy has the advantage of consistently satisfying the Linear Independence Constraint Qualification (LICQ) for an augmented problem, readily enabling regular step computations within the interior-point framework. Additionally, an update rule inspired by the work of Byrd et al. (2012) is implemented, which provides a dynamic increase of the penalty parameter as stationary points are approached. Extensive test results show favorable performance and robustness increases for our ℓ1 —penalty strategies, when compared to the regular version of Ipopt. Moreover, a dynamic optimization problem with nonsmooth dynamics formulated as a Mathematical Program with Complementarity Constraints (MPCC) was solved in a single optimization stage without additional reformulation. Thus, this ℓ1— strategy has proved useful for a broad class of degenerate NLPs.

Key concepts: Mathematical optimization, Robustness (evolution), Nonlinear programming, Nonlinear system, Computer science, Penalty method, Computation, Degenerate energy levels

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The ℓ1—Exact Penalty-Barrier Phase for Degenerate Nonlinear Programming Problems in Ipopt — Research Paper | ScholarLens