2021Cytology and GeneticsRequires access

Morphological and Molecular Cytogenetic Characteristics of Giant Human Oocytes

Maryna Petrushkо, Nataliia Buderatska, J. V. Gontar, Taisiia Yurchuk

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The expedience of using oocytes with morphological dysmorphism in assisted reproduction technology programs is debatable. This study aimed to estimate morphological and molecular cytogenetic characteristics of enlarged oocytes and to predict results of their further fertilization. Among 774 oocytes retrieved from 80 patients, 83 (11%) cells were enlarged. Morphometric analysis showed the diameter of the ooplasm to be (176.67 ± 1.76) μm and the diameter with ZP (200.8 ± 4.24) μm. Among these giant oocytes, 47 (56.6%) were at the metaphase II stage, 26 (31.3%) at the metaphase I stage, and 10 (12.1%) at the prophase I stage. The retrieved giant oocytes were characterized by dysmorphism of endo- and exocytoplasmic structures. Among 47 cells at the metaphase II stage, 40 (85.1%) oocytes had two polar bodies, three (6.4%) oocytes had one polar body, and four (8.5%) oocytes had a fragmented polar body. The assessment of the presence of meiotic spindle by polarization microscopy showed that 39 (83%) oocytes had two meiotic spindles, 3 (6.4%) oocytes had one meiotic spindle, and 5 oocytes (10.6%) had no visualized meiotic spindles despite the presence of polar bodies. After fertilization of 47 oocytes at the metaphase II stage, pronuclei were detected in 42 (89.4%) cells, including 9 (21.4%) oocytes with two pronuclei, 27 (63.3%) oocytes with 3 pronuclei, and 6 (15.3%) oocytes with four pronuclei. The molecular cytogenetic analysis demonstrated that the embryos obtained after fertilization of giant oocytes had a polyploid chromosome set number. Thus, the results of our study showed the inexpediency of using giant oocytes for further fertilization.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The expedience of using oocytes with morphological dysmorphism in assisted reproduction technology programs is debatable. This study aimed to estimate morphological and molecular cytogenetic characteristics of enlarged oocytes and to predict results of their further fertilization. Among 774 oocytes retrieved from 80 patients, 83 (11%) cells were enlarged. Morphometric analysis showed the diameter of the ooplasm to be (176.67 ± 1.76) μm and the diameter with ZP (200.8 ± 4.24) μm. Among these giant oocytes, 47 (56.6%) were at the metaphase II stage, 26 (31.3%) at the metaphase I stage, and 10 (12.1%) at the prophase I stage. The retrieved giant oocytes were characterized by dysmorphism of endo- and exocytoplasmic structures. Among 47 cells at the metaphase II stage, 40 (85.1%) oocytes had two polar bodies, three (6.4%) oocytes had one polar body, and four (8.5%) oocytes had a fragmented polar body. The assessment of the presence of meiotic spindle by polarization microscopy showed that 39 (83%) oocytes had two meiotic spindles, 3 (6.4%) oocytes had one meiotic spindle, and 5 oocytes (10.6%) had no visualized meiotic spindles despite the presence of polar bodies. After fertilization of 47 oocytes at the metaphase II stage, pronuclei were detected in 42 (89.4%) cells, including 9 (21.4%) oocytes with two pronuclei, 27 (63.3%) oocytes with 3 pronuclei, and 6 (15.3%) oocytes with four pronuclei. The molecular cytogenetic analysis demonstrated that the embryos obtained after fertilization of giant oocytes had a polyploid chromosome set number. Thus, the results of our study showed the inexpediency of using giant oocytes for further fertilization.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The expedience of using oocytes with morphological dysmorphism in assisted reproduction technology programs is debatable. This study aimed to estimate morphological and molecular cytogenetic characteristics of enlarged oocytes and to predict results of their further fertilization. Among 774 oocytes retrieved from 80 patients, 83 (11%) cells were enlarged. Morphometric analysis showed the diameter of the ooplasm to be (176.67 ± 1.76) μm and the diameter with ZP (200.8 ± 4.24) μm. Among these giant oocytes, 47 (56.6%) were at the metaphase II stage, 26 (31.3%) at the metaphase I stage, and 10 (12.1%) at the prophase I stage. The retrieved giant oocytes were characterized by dysmorphism of endo- and exocytoplasmic structures. Among 47 cells at the metaphase II stage, 40 (85.1%) oocytes had two polar bodies, three (6.4%) oocytes had one polar body, and four (8.5%) oocytes had a fragmented polar body. The assessment of the presence of meiotic spindle by polarization microscopy showed that 39 (83%) oocytes had two meiotic spindles, 3 (6.4%) oocytes had one meiotic spindle, and 5 oocytes (10.6%) had no visualized meiotic spindles despite the presence of polar bodies. After fertilization of 47 oocytes at the metaphase II stage, pronuclei were detected in 42 (89.4%) cells, including 9 (21.4%) oocytes with two pronuclei, 27 (63.3%) oocytes with 3 pronuclei, and 6 (15.3%) oocytes with four pronuclei. The molecular cytogenetic analysis demonstrated that the embryos obtained after fertilization of giant oocytes had a polyploid chromosome set number. Thus, the results of our study showed the inexpediency of using giant oocytes for further fertilization.

Key concepts: Pronucleus, Polar body, Meiosis, Metaphase, Human fertilization, Oocyte, Biology, Prophase

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Morphological and Molecular Cytogenetic Characteristics of Giant Human Oocytes — Research Paper | ScholarLens