2020Unpublished venueRequires access

Are green investment funds really that bad compared to conventional funds

P.M. Glasmacher

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This thesis aims to provide an answer whether green investment or conventional investment Funds outperform the other in terms of risk-adjusted returns. The measures employed include the Treynor ratio, the Sharpe ratio and the Jensen's alpha. The technique employed uses a matched-pair approach over a ten-year period, to identify statistically significant out/-underperformance. The results provide mixed indications for which type of fund outperforms. Even though, some risk-adjusted-performance medians where differing, the majority of those measures did not differ to a statistically significant degree. However, green funds tend to be less exposed to market-risk, but bear higher fund specific-risk, compared to conventional funds.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This thesis aims to provide an answer whether green investment or conventional investment Funds outperform the other in terms of risk-adjusted returns. The measures employed include the Treynor ratio, the Sharpe ratio and the Jensen's alpha. The technique employed uses a matched-pair approach over a ten-year period, to identify statistically significant out/-underperformance. The results provide mixed indications for which type of fund outperforms. Even though, some risk-adjusted-performance medians where differing, the majority of those measures did not differ to a statistically significant degree. However, green funds tend to be less exposed to market-risk, but bear higher fund specific-risk, compared to conventional funds.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This thesis aims to provide an answer whether green investment or conventional investment Funds outperform the other in terms of risk-adjusted returns. The measures employed include the Treynor ratio, the Sharpe ratio and the Jensen's alpha. The technique employed uses a matched-pair approach over a ten-year period, to identify statistically significant out/-underperformance. The results provide mixed indications for which type of fund outperforms. Even though, some risk-adjusted-performance medians where differing, the majority of those measures did not differ to a statistically significant degree. However, green funds tend to be less exposed to market-risk, but bear higher fund specific-risk, compared to conventional funds.

Key concepts: Treynor ratio, Sharpe ratio, Passive management, Investment (military), Fund of funds, Actuarial science, Economics, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Are green investment funds really that bad compared to conventional funds — Research Paper | ScholarLens