1970Weed ScienceRequires access

Granular vs. Liquid Formulations of Picloram, HRS 587, Fenac, and 2,3,6-TBA for Control of Field Bindweed

Dwane E. Lavake, A. F. Wiese, Ellis W. Chenault

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Better field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensisL.) control was obtained from granular formulations of 2,3,6-trichlorobenzyloxypropanol (hereinafter referred to as HRS 587), 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram), (2,3,6-trichlorophenyl)acetic acid (fenac), and 2,3,6-trichlorobenzoic acid (2,3,6-TBA) than with equivalent amounts of liquid formulations. Two years after application, a granular formulation of picloram at 1 lb/A was as effective as a liquid formulation at 3 lb/A. One and 2 years after application, granular formulations of HRS 587, fenac and 2,3,6-TBA at 10 lb/A gave field bindweed control equal to that obtained with 20 lb/A of liquid formulations of these chemicals. Incorporation did not greatly affect the toxicity of either the liquid or granular formulations of the four herbicides. Increased effectiveness of granular formulations appeared to be associated with longer persistence in the soil.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Better field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensisL.) control was obtained from granular formulations of 2,3,6-trichlorobenzyloxypropanol (hereinafter referred to as HRS 587), 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram), (2,3,6-trichlorophenyl)acetic acid (fenac), and 2,3,6-trichlorobenzoic acid (2,3,6-TBA) than with equivalent amounts of liquid formulations. Two years after application, a granular formulation of picloram at 1 lb/A was as effective as a liquid formulation at 3 lb/A. One and 2 years after application, granular formulations of HRS 587, fenac and 2,3,6-TBA at 10 lb/A gave field bindweed control equal to that obtained with 20 lb/A of liquid formulations of these chemicals. Incorporation did not greatly affect the toxicity of either the liquid or granular formulations of the four herbicides. Increased effectiveness of granular formulations appeared to be associated with longer persistence in the soil.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Better field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensisL.) control was obtained from granular formulations of 2,3,6-trichlorobenzyloxypropanol (hereinafter referred to as HRS 587), 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram), (2,3,6-trichlorophenyl)acetic acid (fenac), and 2,3,6-trichlorobenzoic acid (2,3,6-TBA) than with equivalent amounts of liquid formulations. Two years after application, a granular formulation of picloram at 1 lb/A was as effective as a liquid formulation at 3 lb/A. One and 2 years after application, granular formulations of HRS 587, fenac and 2,3,6-TBA at 10 lb/A gave field bindweed control equal to that obtained with 20 lb/A of liquid formulations of these chemicals. Incorporation did not greatly affect the toxicity of either the liquid or granular formulations of the four herbicides. Increased effectiveness of granular formulations appeared to be associated with longer persistence in the soil.

Key concepts: Picloram, Convolvulus, Acetic acid, Chemistry, Chromatography, Weed, Agronomy, Organic chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Granular vs. Liquid Formulations of Picloram, HRS 587, Fenac, and 2,3,6-TBA for Control of Field Bindweed — Research Paper | ScholarLens