2021•Mesentery and PeritoneumOpen access

AB118. SOH21AS063. Nasopharyngitis as a clinical indicator of laryngopharyngeal reflux

Máire Gaffney, Ross O’Shea, Majura Kaare, John Eugene Fenton

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Background: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) refers to the back-flow or aerosolisation of stomach contents, past the oesophagus into the larynx or pharynx, that is becoming more prevalent in today’s population. The mechanism leading to the mucous membrane damage in the upper airways is not fully understood but low pH and gastric enzymes appear to play a role. The lower oesophagus has many natural acid protective factors whereas the nasopharynx does not, this means that any acid exposure either liquid or gaseous can cause various inflammatory changes in the pharynx and larynx. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients found to have isolated nasopharyngitis and who were reviewed following a 3-month therapeutic regime of twice-daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medication was performed. To confirm the diagnosis of LPR, the patients were all evaluated with various scores, indexes and nasopharyngoscopy. As a consequence of many years performing nasopharyngoscopy on an extensive cohort of patients and searching specifically for nasopharyngitis on each occasion, the senior author (JEF) has developed a personal grading system for nasopharyngitis with findings described as 0 = absent, 1 = mild nasopharyngeal erythema, 2 = moderate granular mucosal or raised mucosal changes, 3 = severe crusting and/or blood-stained mucositis. Patients returned to the clinic 3–4 months later to the clinic, where they were reassessed and these scoring systems are used to evaluate the response to the therapeutic course of PPIs, described above (PPIs BD for 3/12), from both their symptoms and nasopharyngitis, laryngeal or hypopharyngeal severity findings. Results: The majority of patients has an improvement in their symptoms and nasopharyngeal inflammatory changes. A midline forehead headache seemed to be a symptom strongly associated with nasopharyngitis. Posterior commissure oedema was also a consistent finding in these patients. Conclusions: The combination of a regular midline forehead headache, nasopharyngitis and oedema of the posterior aspect of the larynx paper to be strong clinical indicators of LPR.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) refers to the back-flow or aerosolisation of stomach contents, past the oesophagus into the larynx or pharynx, that is becoming more prevalent in today’s population. The mechanism leading to the mucous membrane damage in the upper airways is not fully understood but low pH and gastric enzymes appear to play a role. The lower oesophagus has many natural acid protective factors whereas the nasopharynx does not, this means that any acid exposure either liquid or gaseous can cause various inflammatory changes in the pharynx and larynx. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients found to have isolated nasopharyngitis and who were reviewed following a 3-month therapeutic regime of twice-daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medication was performed. To confirm the diagnosis of LPR, the patients were all evaluated with various scores, indexes and nasopharyngoscopy. As a consequence of many years performing nasopharyngoscopy on an extensive cohort of patients and searching specifically for nasopharyngitis on each occasion, the senior author (JEF) has developed a personal grading system for nasopharyngitis with findings described as 0 = absent, 1 = mild nasopharyngeal erythema, 2 = moderate granular mucosal or raised mucosal changes, 3 = severe crusting and/or blood-stained mucositis. Patients returned to the clinic 3–4 months later to the clinic, where they were reassessed and these scoring systems are used to evaluate the response to the therapeutic course of PPIs, described above (PPIs BD for 3/12), from both their symptoms and nasopharyngitis, laryngeal or hypopharyngeal severity findings. Results: The majority of patients has an improvement in their symptoms and nasopharyngeal inflammatory changes. A midline forehead headache seemed to be a symptom strongly associated with nasopharyngitis. Posterior commissure oedema was also a consistent finding in these patients. Conclusions: The combination of a regular midline forehead headache, nasopharyngitis and oedema of the posterior aspect of the larynx paper to be strong clinical indicators of LPR.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) refers to the back-flow or aerosolisation of stomach contents, past the oesophagus into the larynx or pharynx, that is becoming more prevalent in today’s population. The mechanism leading to the mucous membrane damage in the upper airways is not fully understood but low pH and gastric enzymes appear to play a role. The lower oesophagus has many natural acid protective factors whereas the nasopharynx does not, this means that any acid exposure either liquid or gaseous can cause various inflammatory changes in the pharynx and larynx. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients found to have isolated nasopharyngitis and who were reviewed following a 3-month therapeutic regime of twice-daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medication was performed. To confirm the diagnosis of LPR, the patients were all evaluated with various scores, indexes and nasopharyngoscopy. As a consequence of many years performing nasopharyngoscopy on an extensive cohort of patients and searching specifically for nasopharyngitis on each occasion, the senior author (JEF) has developed a personal grading system for nasopharyngitis with findings described as 0 = absent, 1 = mild nasopharyngeal erythema, 2 = moderate granular mucosal or raised mucosal changes, 3 = severe crusting and/or blood-stained mucositis. Patients returned to the clinic 3–4 months later to the clinic, where they were reassessed and these scoring systems are used to evaluate the response to the therapeutic course of PPIs, described above (PPIs BD for 3/12), from both their symptoms and nasopharyngitis, laryngeal or hypopharyngeal severity findings. Results: The majority of patients has an improvement in their symptoms and nasopharyngeal inflammatory changes. A midline forehead headache seemed to be a symptom strongly associated with nasopharyngitis. Posterior commissure oedema was also a consistent finding in these patients. Conclusions: The combination of a regular midline forehead headache, nasopharyngitis and oedema of the posterior aspect of the larynx paper to be strong clinical indicators of LPR.

Key concepts: Laryngopharyngeal reflux, Pharynx, Larynx, Medicine, Reflux, Mucous membrane, Stomach, Population

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
AB118. SOH21AS063. Nasopharyngitis as a clinical indicator of laryngopharyngeal reflux — Research Paper | ScholarLens