2012•BYU Law Library (Brigham Young University)Open access

Social-Network Theory and the Diffusion of the Search-and-Seizure Exclusionary Rule Among State Courts Between Weeks and Wolf

Laurence A. Benner, Robert C. Bird, Donald J. Smythe

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

2011). 3. Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914).Coefficients are on top; test statistics are in parentheses on bottom.* Statistically significant at the 95% level of confidence.** Statistically significant at the 90% level of confidence.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

2011). 3. Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914).Coefficients are on top; test statistics are in parentheses on bottom.* Statistically significant at the 95% level of confidence.** Statistically significant at the 90% level of confidence.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

2011). 3. Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914).Coefficients are on top; test statistics are in parentheses on bottom.* Statistically significant at the 95% level of confidence.** Statistically significant at the 90% level of confidence.

Key concepts: Exclusionary rule, Search and seizure, Supreme court, Law, Constitution, Political science, State (computer science), Due process

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Social-Network Theory and the Diffusion of the Search-and-Seizure Exclusionary Rule Among State Courts Between Weeks and Wolf — Research Paper | ScholarLens