2015中国医学科学杂志:英文版Requires access

Assessment of Stroke Volume Variation Perioperativelyby Using Arterial Pressure with Cardiac Output

Wenjing, Li, Yiping, Hu, Minmin, Zhu Zhu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To observe the sensitivity of stroke volume variation (SVV) for assessing volume changeduring induction period of general anesthesia.Methods Patients who underwent orthopaedic surgery under general anesthesia and mechanicalventilation were divided into two groups randomly. Patients in the group Ⅰwere subjected to progressivecentral hypovolemia and correction of hypovolemia sequentially; patients in the Group Ⅱ were exposed tohypervolemia alone. Each step was implemented after 5 minutes when the hemodynamics was stable. SVV andcardiac index (CI) were recorded, and Pearson's product-moment correlation was used to analyze correlationbetween SVV and CI.Results Forty patients were included in this study, 20 cases in each group. For group Ⅰ patients,SVV was increased significantly along with blood volume reduction, and changes in CI were negativelycorrelated with changes in SVV (r=-0.605, P〈0.01); SVV decreased significantly along with correction ofblood volume; changes in CI were negatively correlated with changes in SVV (r=-0.651, P〈0.01). For groupⅡ patients, along with blood volume increase, SVV did not change significantly; changes in CI revealed nosignificant correlation with changes in SVV (r=0.067, P〉0.05).Conclusion SVV is a useful indicator for hypovolemia, but not for hypervolemia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To observe the sensitivity of stroke volume variation (SVV) for assessing volume changeduring induction period of general anesthesia.Methods Patients who underwent orthopaedic surgery under general anesthesia and mechanicalventilation were divided into two groups randomly. Patients in the group Ⅰwere subjected to progressivecentral hypovolemia and correction of hypovolemia sequentially; patients in the Group Ⅱ were exposed tohypervolemia alone. Each step was implemented after 5 minutes when the hemodynamics was stable. SVV andcardiac index (CI) were recorded, and Pearson's product-moment correlation was used to analyze correlationbetween SVV and CI.Results Forty patients were included in this study, 20 cases in each group. For group Ⅰ patients,SVV was increased significantly along with blood volume reduction, and changes in CI were negativelycorrelated with changes in SVV (r=-0.605, P〈0.01); SVV decreased significantly along with correction ofblood volume; changes in CI were negatively correlated with changes in SVV (r=-0.651, P〈0.01). For groupⅡ patients, along with blood volume increase, SVV did not change significantly; changes in CI revealed nosignificant correlation with changes in SVV (r=0.067, P〉0.05).Conclusion SVV is a useful indicator for hypovolemia, but not for hypervolemia.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To observe the sensitivity of stroke volume variation (SVV) for assessing volume changeduring induction period of general anesthesia.Methods Patients who underwent orthopaedic surgery under general anesthesia and mechanicalventilation were divided into two groups randomly. Patients in the group Ⅰwere subjected to progressivecentral hypovolemia and correction of hypovolemia sequentially; patients in the Group Ⅱ were exposed tohypervolemia alone. Each step was implemented after 5 minutes when the hemodynamics was stable. SVV andcardiac index (CI) were recorded, and Pearson's product-moment correlation was used to analyze correlationbetween SVV and CI.Results Forty patients were included in this study, 20 cases in each group. For group Ⅰ patients,SVV was increased significantly along with blood volume reduction, and changes in CI were negativelycorrelated with changes in SVV (r=-0.605, P〈0.01); SVV decreased significantly along with correction ofblood volume; changes in CI were negatively correlated with changes in SVV (r=-0.651, P〈0.01). For groupⅡ patients, along with blood volume increase, SVV did not change significantly; changes in CI revealed nosignificant correlation with changes in SVV (r=0.067, P〉0.05).Conclusion SVV is a useful indicator for hypovolemia, but not for hypervolemia.

Key concepts: Hypervolemia, Hypovolemia, Medicine, Stroke volume, Anesthesia, Hemodynamics, Cardiac output, Cardiac index

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessment of Stroke Volume Variation Perioperativelyby Using Arterial Pressure with Cardiac Output — Research Paper | ScholarLens