2020•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

The Consideration Myth About Smart Contracts

Mark Giancaspro

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Smart contracts and the blockchain have generated considerable excitement and concern (in equal measure) throughout the commercial world. These technologies promise to revolutionise commercial transactions by making them faster, cheaper, more transparent and more secure. Opponents, however, have warned of the issues that arise through the use of these technologies. One major concern is that smart contracts will not be compatible with existing laws. Some commentators have suggested that these contracts lack consideration and are prima facie unenforceable. This paper bluntly dismisses this suggestion. Such a ‘myth’ has been constructed upon misconceptions of the nature of smart contracts and the legal obligations they contain and enforce. It will be argued that smart contracts do not, as a class, lack consideration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Smart contracts and the blockchain have generated considerable excitement and concern (in equal measure) throughout the commercial world. These technologies promise to revolutionise commercial transactions by making them faster, cheaper, more transparent and more secure. Opponents, however, have warned of the issues that arise through the use of these technologies. One major concern is that smart contracts will not be compatible with existing laws. Some commentators have suggested that these contracts lack consideration and are prima facie unenforceable. This paper bluntly dismisses this suggestion. Such a ‘myth’ has been constructed upon misconceptions of the nature of smart contracts and the legal obligations they contain and enforce. It will be argued that smart contracts do not, as a class, lack consideration.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Smart contracts and the blockchain have generated considerable excitement and concern (in equal measure) throughout the commercial world. These technologies promise to revolutionise commercial transactions by making them faster, cheaper, more transparent and more secure. Opponents, however, have warned of the issues that arise through the use of these technologies. One major concern is that smart contracts will not be compatible with existing laws. Some commentators have suggested that these contracts lack consideration and are prima facie unenforceable. This paper bluntly dismisses this suggestion. Such a ‘myth’ has been constructed upon misconceptions of the nature of smart contracts and the legal obligations they contain and enforce. It will be argued that smart contracts do not, as a class, lack consideration.

Key concepts: Prima facie, Law and economics, Business, Mythology, Law, Economics, Computer security, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Consideration Myth About Smart Contracts — Research Paper | ScholarLens