1980TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)Requires access

Evaluation of Seedbed Preparation & Alachlor Combinations for Weed Control in Soybeans

Young, Ralph

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Alachlor [2'-chloro-2',6'-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl) acetanilide] in combination with linuron [3-(3,4-dichlorphenyl)-1 methoxy-1-methylurea (n'-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methoxy-Nmehtylures)] and metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazin-5(4H)-one 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethy-ethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,3-triazin-5(4 H)-one] was evaluated for its control of broadleaf and annual grasses in Mitchell soybeans (Glycine max L.) under four different tillage conditions. The experiment was conducted in the summers of 1978 and 1979. The tillage treatments evaluated were conventional tillage, double disking, single disking, and no-tillage. Alachlor at 2.2, 2.8, and 3.4 kg/ha was used alone and in combination with metribuzin at 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 kg/ha and linuron at 0.6, 0.8, and 1.2 kg/ha. All treatments were compared with a check which received no residual herbicide application. All plots received an application of glyphosate [N,N-bis(phosphonmethyl) glycine] at 2.2 kg/ha to control emerged vegetation. The results of the experiment showed no interaction between tillage conditions and herbicide applications. There were no significant differences in broadleaf weed control or yields in the tillage plots for either 1978 or 1979. Significant differences were found in yields as affected by herbicide treatments in 1978, but none were found in 1979. Differences did not follow any logical pattern and were not consistent between years.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Alachlor [2'-chloro-2',6'-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl) acetanilide] in combination with linuron [3-(3,4-dichlorphenyl)-1 methoxy-1-methylurea (n'-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methoxy-Nmehtylures)] and metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazin-5(4H)-one 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethy-ethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,3-triazin-5(4 H)-one] was evaluated for its control of broadleaf and annual grasses in Mitchell soybeans (Glycine max L.) under four different tillage conditions. The experiment was conducted in the summers of 1978 and 1979. The tillage treatments evaluated were conventional tillage, double disking, single disking, and no-tillage. Alachlor at 2.2, 2.8, and 3.4 kg/ha was used alone and in combination with metribuzin at 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 kg/ha and linuron at 0.6, 0.8, and 1.2 kg/ha. All treatments were compared with a check which received no residual herbicide application. All plots received an application of glyphosate [N,N-bis(phosphonmethyl) glycine] at 2.2 kg/ha to control emerged vegetation. The results of the experiment showed no interaction between tillage conditions and herbicide applications. There were no significant differences in broadleaf weed control or yields in the tillage plots for either 1978 or 1979. Significant differences were found in yields as affected by herbicide treatments in 1978, but none were found in 1979. Differences did not follow any logical pattern and were not consistent between years.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Alachlor [2'-chloro-2',6'-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl) acetanilide] in combination with linuron [3-(3,4-dichlorphenyl)-1 methoxy-1-methylurea (n'-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methoxy-Nmehtylures)] and metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazin-5(4H)-one 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethy-ethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,3-triazin-5(4 H)-one] was evaluated for its control of broadleaf and annual grasses in Mitchell soybeans (Glycine max L.) under four different tillage conditions. The experiment was conducted in the summers of 1978 and 1979. The tillage treatments evaluated were conventional tillage, double disking, single disking, and no-tillage. Alachlor at 2.2, 2.8, and 3.4 kg/ha was used alone and in combination with metribuzin at 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 kg/ha and linuron at 0.6, 0.8, and 1.2 kg/ha. All treatments were compared with a check which received no residual herbicide application. All plots received an application of glyphosate [N,N-bis(phosphonmethyl) glycine] at 2.2 kg/ha to control emerged vegetation. The results of the experiment showed no interaction between tillage conditions and herbicide applications. There were no significant differences in broadleaf weed control or yields in the tillage plots for either 1978 or 1979. Significant differences were found in yields as affected by herbicide treatments in 1978, but none were found in 1979. Differences did not follow any logical pattern and were not consistent between years.

Key concepts: Seedbed, Alachlor, Weed control, Weed, Agronomy, Agroforestry, Environmental science, Geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Seedbed Preparation & Alachlor Combinations for Weed Control in Soybeans — Research Paper | ScholarLens