Private Strategy and Efficiency: Repeated Partnership Games Revisited
Ichiro Obara
Abstract
Open-access reader
Ichiro Obara
Abstract
Open-access reader
This paper studies repeated partnership games with only two public signals. It is well known that the public perfect equilibrium payoff set is bounded away from the efficient frontier of the stage game in this class of game. In this paper, I construct a strongly symmetric sequential equilibrium whose equilibrium payoff dominates the best symmetric payoff by PPE. The strategy used to construct the equilibrium depends not only on the public signal but also on the realization of one’s own past action. I call this class of strategy private strategy. I also provide an example where this private strategy sequential equilibrium approximates the efficient outcome, but the PPE payoff set is contained in an arbitrary small neighborhood of the stage game Nash equilibrium payoff. This example suggests that the difference between a PPE payoff set and a sequential equilibriujm payoff set can be potentially significant. I am grateful to George Mailath and Andrew Postlewaite for their encouragement and valuable suggestions.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper studies repeated partnership games with only two public signals. It is well known that the public perfect equilibrium payoff set is bounded away from the efficient frontier of the stage game in this class of game. In this paper, I construct a strongly symmetric sequential equilibrium whose equilibrium payoff dominates the best symmetric payoff by PPE. The strategy used to construct the equilibrium depends not only on the public signal but also on the realization of one’s own past action. I call this class of strategy private strategy. I also provide an example where this private strategy sequential equilibrium approximates the efficient outcome, but the PPE payoff set is contained in an arbitrary small neighborhood of the stage game Nash equilibrium payoff. This example suggests that the difference between a PPE payoff set and a sequential equilibriujm payoff set can be potentially significant. I am grateful to George Mailath and Andrew Postlewaite for their encouragement and valuable suggestions.
Key concepts: Stochastic game, Repeated game, Mathematical economics, Nash equilibrium, Traveler's dilemma, Symmetric game, Best response, Equilibrium selection