2007Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

United States in Outer Space: Security Assurance and Preservation

Richard V. Graham

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Free access to-and-use of space assets by all nations in today's highly interdependent globalize society has been the long-standing policy of the United States dating back to the Eisenhower Administration. This point is espoused in the recent National Space Policy (2006) which commits to the "use of outer space by all nations for peaceful purposes and...benefit of all humanity..." Yet the new policy also postures a unilateral tone and position that opposes the development of either new legal regimes or other restrictions that "...prohibit or limit US access to or use of space." Those restrictions include international arms control legislation, treaties, or resolutions that limit space weapon technology. This paper will first show how the current Space Policy is flawed by excluding multilateral diplomatic space-arms-initiatives, international cooperation, and ignores "common security" of other states. This one dimensional and self-fulfilling policy may increase asymmetrical threats to US space assets. The second part of this paper will use the recent Chinese anti-satellite test to constructively propose a basis for "non-armament treaties" using as examples the Incidents as Sea Agreements, the Bunn Initiative, and the Antarctic Treaty to forge non-threatening, transparent, confidence-building alliances that would address each state's security concerns, allow for the continuation of the United States' defensive ballistic missile defenses, and maintain for all mankind the use of outer space for peaceful purposes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Free access to-and-use of space assets by all nations in today's highly interdependent globalize society has been the long-standing policy of the United States dating back to the Eisenhower Administration. This point is espoused in the recent National Space Policy (2006) which commits to the "use of outer space by all nations for peaceful purposes and...benefit of all humanity..." Yet the new policy also postures a unilateral tone and position that opposes the development of either new legal regimes or other restrictions that "...prohibit or limit US access to or use of space." Those restrictions include international arms control legislation, treaties, or resolutions that limit space weapon technology. This paper will first show how the current Space Policy is flawed by excluding multilateral diplomatic space-arms-initiatives, international cooperation, and ignores "common security" of other states. This one dimensional and self-fulfilling policy may increase asymmetrical threats to US space assets. The second part of this paper will use the recent Chinese anti-satellite test to constructively propose a basis for "non-armament treaties" using as examples the Incidents as Sea Agreements, the Bunn Initiative, and the Antarctic Treaty to forge non-threatening, transparent, confidence-building alliances that would address each state's security concerns, allow for the continuation of the United States' defensive ballistic missile defenses, and maintain for all mankind the use of outer space for peaceful purposes.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Free access to-and-use of space assets by all nations in today's highly interdependent globalize society has been the long-standing policy of the United States dating back to the Eisenhower Administration. This point is espoused in the recent National Space Policy (2006) which commits to the "use of outer space by all nations for peaceful purposes and...benefit of all humanity..." Yet the new policy also postures a unilateral tone and position that opposes the development of either new legal regimes or other restrictions that "...prohibit or limit US access to or use of space." Those restrictions include international arms control legislation, treaties, or resolutions that limit space weapon technology. This paper will first show how the current Space Policy is flawed by excluding multilateral diplomatic space-arms-initiatives, international cooperation, and ignores "common security" of other states. This one dimensional and self-fulfilling policy may increase asymmetrical threats to US space assets. The second part of this paper will use the recent Chinese anti-satellite test to constructively propose a basis for "non-armament treaties" using as examples the Incidents as Sea Agreements, the Bunn Initiative, and the Antarctic Treaty to forge non-threatening, transparent, confidence-building alliances that would address each state's security concerns, allow for the continuation of the United States' defensive ballistic missile defenses, and maintain for all mankind the use of outer space for peaceful purposes.

Key concepts: Outer space, Space policy, Space law, Arms control, Space (punctuation), Treaty, Global commons, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
United States in Outer Space: Security Assurance and Preservation — Research Paper | ScholarLens