2011The Blackwell Companion to PhonologyRequires access

Consonant Harmony in Child Language

Clara C. Levelt

Open publisher page 74 citations

Abstract

Consonant harmony (CH) in child language production data has attracted a great deal of attention in the phonological literature. It has been defined as an “assimilation‐at‐a‐distance” process between consonants (Vihman 1978), in which consonants affect other, non‐adjacent consonants. The assimilating features in child language CH are mostly primary place of articulation features, like Labial and Dorsal, but cases where other features are involved have also been observed. Over time, several analyses of this phenomenon have been proposed in the literature, the nature of the analysis changing with the theoretical state of the art: a phonological rule (Smith 1973), autosegmental spreading (Menn 1978; McDonough and Myers 1991; Stemberger and Stoel‐Gammon 1991; Levelt 1994), a connectionist account (Berg and Schade 2000), and constraint interaction (Goad 1997; Pater and Werle 2003; Fikkert and Levelt 2008).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Consonant harmony (CH) in child language production data has attracted a great deal of attention in the phonological literature. It has been defined as an “assimilation‐at‐a‐distance” process between consonants (Vihman 1978), in which consonants affect other, non‐adjacent consonants. The assimilating features in child language CH are mostly primary place of articulation features, like Labial and Dorsal, but cases where other features are involved have also been observed. Over time, several analyses of this phenomenon have been proposed in the literature, the nature of the analysis changing with the theoretical state of the art: a phonological rule (Smith 1973), autosegmental spreading (Menn 1978; McDonough and Myers 1991; Stemberger and Stoel‐Gammon 1991; Levelt 1994), a connectionist account (Berg and Schade 2000), and constraint interaction (Goad 1997; Pater and Werle 2003; Fikkert and Levelt 2008).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 74 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Consonant harmony (CH) in child language production data has attracted a great deal of attention in the phonological literature. It has been defined as an “assimilation‐at‐a‐distance” process between consonants (Vihman 1978), in which consonants affect other, non‐adjacent consonants. The assimilating features in child language CH are mostly primary place of articulation features, like Labial and Dorsal, but cases where other features are involved have also been observed. Over time, several analyses of this phenomenon have been proposed in the literature, the nature of the analysis changing with the theoretical state of the art: a phonological rule (Smith 1973), autosegmental spreading (Menn 1978; McDonough and Myers 1991; Stemberger and Stoel‐Gammon 1991; Levelt 1994), a connectionist account (Berg and Schade 2000), and constraint interaction (Goad 1997; Pater and Werle 2003; Fikkert and Levelt 2008).

Key concepts: Consonant, Linguistics, Vowel harmony, Assimilation (phonology), Phonological rule, Harmony (color), Computer science, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Consonant Harmony in Child Language — Research Paper | ScholarLens