2004•Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive SurgeryRequires access

REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF REVISION OF TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT

Dongpeng Du

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical value of the revision of total hip replacement(THR), to analyse the reason of the revisions, and to discuss the main difficulties and measures to manage it. Methods From June 1998 to January 2002, 15 cases (15 hips) were revised on total hip replacement. The reasons for revision in the cases were as follows:failure of primary operative techenique, loosening and sinking of the components, displacement of the prosthesis, erosion of the acetabulum, as well as fracture of the femoral stem. The main difficulties of the revision were:poor health condition of the patients; the remove of the prosthesis of the primary THR, especially the broken femoral stem and the cements; the loss of local bone. The measures to remove the broken femoral stem were described. Results All cases were followed up 2.4 years on average: 2 patients died from heart disease and cerebrovascular disease respectively, while the good results were achieved in the others. No infection, dislocation, loosening, and other complications occurred. The good effects were related with following factors:mild degree of illness; no severe bone defect; most of the first femoral head replacement. Conclusion The revision of THR is a more difficult operation, so that the special instrument and equipment and operative experience are required.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the clinical value of the revision of total hip replacement(THR), to analyse the reason of the revisions, and to discuss the main difficulties and measures to manage it. Methods From June 1998 to January 2002, 15 cases (15 hips) were revised on total hip replacement. The reasons for revision in the cases were as follows:failure of primary operative techenique, loosening and sinking of the components, displacement of the prosthesis, erosion of the acetabulum, as well as fracture of the femoral stem. The main difficulties of the revision were:poor health condition of the patients; the remove of the prosthesis of the primary THR, especially the broken femoral stem and the cements; the loss of local bone. The measures to remove the broken femoral stem were described. Results All cases were followed up 2.4 years on average: 2 patients died from heart disease and cerebrovascular disease respectively, while the good results were achieved in the others. No infection, dislocation, loosening, and other complications occurred. The good effects were related with following factors:mild degree of illness; no severe bone defect; most of the first femoral head replacement. Conclusion The revision of THR is a more difficult operation, so that the special instrument and equipment and operative experience are required.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical value of the revision of total hip replacement(THR), to analyse the reason of the revisions, and to discuss the main difficulties and measures to manage it. Methods From June 1998 to January 2002, 15 cases (15 hips) were revised on total hip replacement. The reasons for revision in the cases were as follows:failure of primary operative techenique, loosening and sinking of the components, displacement of the prosthesis, erosion of the acetabulum, as well as fracture of the femoral stem. The main difficulties of the revision were:poor health condition of the patients; the remove of the prosthesis of the primary THR, especially the broken femoral stem and the cements; the loss of local bone. The measures to remove the broken femoral stem were described. Results All cases were followed up 2.4 years on average: 2 patients died from heart disease and cerebrovascular disease respectively, while the good results were achieved in the others. No infection, dislocation, loosening, and other complications occurred. The good effects were related with following factors:mild degree of illness; no severe bone defect; most of the first femoral head replacement. Conclusion The revision of THR is a more difficult operation, so that the special instrument and equipment and operative experience are required.

Key concepts: Medicine, Acetabulum, Total hip replacement, Femoral head, Prosthesis, Surgery, Dentistry

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF REVISION OF TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT — Research Paper | ScholarLens