2016Unpublished venueRequires access

Do Wedding Dresses Come in Lavender? The Prospects and Implications of Same-Sex Marriage

Angela Boite

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

On 3 December 1996, a Hawaiian state court upheld the legalization of same-sex marriage, although the next day the presiding judge set the ruling aside pending the outcome of an appeal by the state. This ruling rekindled fears that exist regarding the potential legalization of same-sex marriage throughout the United States. To answer concerns regarding same-sex marriage, I will examine several issues. First, the concept of marriage must be defined. Opponents often argue that same-sex marriage violates the definition of marriage and, thus, same-sex marriage should not be legalized. Second, given the difficulty of defining the concept of marriage, I will undertake an examination of the features of marriage so as to illustrate the compatibility of same-sex marriage with those features. Third, I will examine traditional legal arguments against same-sex marriage for their validity. Fourth, I will evaluate Claudia Card's arguments against same-sex marriage and offer a response to these arguments. Finally, I will explore domestic partnerships as a potential alternative to same-sex marriage. Once these steps are completed, it will be seen that same-sex marriage would be beneficial, rather than harmful, to the institution of marriage.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

On 3 December 1996, a Hawaiian state court upheld the legalization of same-sex marriage, although the next day the presiding judge set the ruling aside pending the outcome of an appeal by the state. This ruling rekindled fears that exist regarding the potential legalization of same-sex marriage throughout the United States. To answer concerns regarding same-sex marriage, I will examine several issues. First, the concept of marriage must be defined. Opponents often argue that same-sex marriage violates the definition of marriage and, thus, same-sex marriage should not be legalized. Second, given the difficulty of defining the concept of marriage, I will undertake an examination of the features of marriage so as to illustrate the compatibility of same-sex marriage with those features. Third, I will examine traditional legal arguments against same-sex marriage for their validity. Fourth, I will evaluate Claudia Card's arguments against same-sex marriage and offer a response to these arguments. Finally, I will explore domestic partnerships as a potential alternative to same-sex marriage. Once these steps are completed, it will be seen that same-sex marriage would be beneficial, rather than harmful, to the institution of marriage.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

On 3 December 1996, a Hawaiian state court upheld the legalization of same-sex marriage, although the next day the presiding judge set the ruling aside pending the outcome of an appeal by the state. This ruling rekindled fears that exist regarding the potential legalization of same-sex marriage throughout the United States. To answer concerns regarding same-sex marriage, I will examine several issues. First, the concept of marriage must be defined. Opponents often argue that same-sex marriage violates the definition of marriage and, thus, same-sex marriage should not be legalized. Second, given the difficulty of defining the concept of marriage, I will undertake an examination of the features of marriage so as to illustrate the compatibility of same-sex marriage with those features. Third, I will examine traditional legal arguments against same-sex marriage for their validity. Fourth, I will evaluate Claudia Card's arguments against same-sex marriage and offer a response to these arguments. Finally, I will explore domestic partnerships as a potential alternative to same-sex marriage. Once these steps are completed, it will be seen that same-sex marriage would be beneficial, rather than harmful, to the institution of marriage.

Key concepts: Legalization, Appeal, Aside, Same sex, State (computer science), Law, Sociology, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Do Wedding Dresses Come in Lavender? The Prospects and Implications of Same-Sex Marriage — Research Paper | ScholarLens