Court of Appeal: ‘The New Court has Failed to Meet Expectations’
Seth Barrett Tillman
Abstract
Seth Barrett Tillman
Abstract
With the recent publication of the Courts Service’s 2017 Annual Report, we now have statistics on the Court of Appeal’s first three years of operation. We can now ask the question: Has the Court of Appeal—which was approved by the voters in the October 2013 referendum—successfully dealt with the judicial backlog of appeals which it was created to address? The answer is: No. By any reasonable benchmark, the new court has failed to meet expectations.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
With the recent publication of the Courts Service’s 2017 Annual Report, we now have statistics on the Court of Appeal’s first three years of operation. We can now ask the question: Has the Court of Appeal—which was approved by the voters in the October 2013 referendum—successfully dealt with the judicial backlog of appeals which it was created to address? The answer is: No. By any reasonable benchmark, the new court has failed to meet expectations.
Key concepts: Appeal, Referendum, High Court, Law, Political science, Law of the case, Remand (court procedure), Court of record