Periodic Analysis of Arrival Times in Delayed Cosmic-Ray Coincidences
N. A. POR'rER
Abstract
N. A. POR'rER
Abstract
GL'NN and 0 S T R I K E R (1) have proposed an clTicient acceleration mechanism for cosmic rays in the vicinity of pulsars. While the theory is ditIicult to t~est directly, an observation of h ighenergy y-rays from the direction of a pulsar would give supporting evidence for it. A flux of y-rays in the l0 ~ eV energy region has been reported from the Crab Nebula, though they may not come from its central pulsar NP 0532 (*). Some observations, using the a~mosphcric (~crenkov technique, have indicated both continuous and periodic y-rays from some other pulsars (~-5), but continued observation ham z~ot confirmed these (~'~). Indee(t, CHATTERJI.~E etal. (s) have shown that for most pulsars the flux limits obtainable with the technique are greater than the total energy output, and only the Crab pulsar is likely to ~ivc detectable fluxes. It remains possible: however, that there may bc sporadic periodic emission of detectable fluxes of y-rays, and certainly there is evidence that the flux from the Crab Nebula is correlated with ~,glitcbes ,~ in NP 0532 (). I t has also been suggested (9) that under favourable conditions charged paxticles might be cham~elled to the Earth by magnetic fields and preserve their periodicity. In this case, however, any periodicity present would correspond to an earlier m~kl~own epoch, and WEEKES (~o) has pointed out that very highly monoencrgetic beams of particles would be required to preserve phase.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
GL'NN and 0 S T R I K E R (1) have proposed an clTicient acceleration mechanism for cosmic rays in the vicinity of pulsars. While the theory is ditIicult to t~est directly, an observation of h ighenergy y-rays from the direction of a pulsar would give supporting evidence for it. A flux of y-rays in the l0 ~ eV energy region has been reported from the Crab Nebula, though they may not come from its central pulsar NP 0532 (*). Some observations, using the a~mosphcric (~crenkov technique, have indicated both continuous and periodic y-rays from some other pulsars (~-5), but continued observation ham z~ot confirmed these (~'~). Indee(t, CHATTERJI.~E etal. (s) have shown that for most pulsars the flux limits obtainable with the technique are greater than the total energy output, and only the Crab pulsar is likely to ~ivc detectable fluxes. It remains possible: however, that there may bc sporadic periodic emission of detectable fluxes of y-rays, and certainly there is evidence that the flux from the Crab Nebula is correlated with ~,glitcbes ,~ in NP 0532 (). I t has also been suggested (9) that under favourable conditions charged paxticles might be cham~elled to the Earth by magnetic fields and preserve their periodicity. In this case, however, any periodicity present would correspond to an earlier m~kl~own epoch, and WEEKES (~o) has pointed out that very highly monoencrgetic beams of particles would be required to preserve phase.
Key concepts: Pulsar, Crab Nebula, Physics, Astrophysics, Cosmic ray, Flux (metallurgy), Nebula, Crab Pulsar