2021PubMedRequires access

Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting During an Ondansetron Shortage.

Cdr Chad Moore, L T Rusty Bledsoe, Cdr Raymond Bonds, Margaux F. Keller, Capt Heather King

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) degrades patient experience and increases healthcare costs. Estimates of PONV range from 10% to 80%. The Apfel Simplified Score is an evidence-based instrument for determining individual risk of PONV. Scoring enables anesthesia providers to match antiemetic strategies with the calculated risk of PONV. Data were collected across 3 times. After the Apfel scoring system was automated into the electronic medical record, providers were more likely to increase PONV prophylaxis for patients at highest risk and reduce prophylaxis for patients at lowest risk. Rates of PONV remained similar at baseline (34.7%) and in the early postimplementation period (38.8%); a modest reduction was observed in the final period (26.5%). Intravenous ondansetron, the most common antiemetic at baseline, was not available in the early postimplementation period, which may partially explain the initial increase in PONV. While ondansetron was unavailable, providers began using 3 other antiemetics, a practice that persisted once intravenous ondansetron returned. The Apfel score is an evidence-based tool that providers can use to reduce the risk of PONV. This electronic tool and the reminder cards have been shared across the US Military Health System, fostering an organizational culture that values targeted prophylaxis for PONV.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) degrades patient experience and increases healthcare costs. Estimates of PONV range from 10% to 80%. The Apfel Simplified Score is an evidence-based instrument for determining individual risk of PONV. Scoring enables anesthesia providers to match antiemetic strategies with the calculated risk of PONV. Data were collected across 3 times. After the Apfel scoring system was automated into the electronic medical record, providers were more likely to increase PONV prophylaxis for patients at highest risk and reduce prophylaxis for patients at lowest risk. Rates of PONV remained similar at baseline (34.7%) and in the early postimplementation period (38.8%); a modest reduction was observed in the final period (26.5%). Intravenous ondansetron, the most common antiemetic at baseline, was not available in the early postimplementation period, which may partially explain the initial increase in PONV. While ondansetron was unavailable, providers began using 3 other antiemetics, a practice that persisted once intravenous ondansetron returned. The Apfel score is an evidence-based tool that providers can use to reduce the risk of PONV. This electronic tool and the reminder cards have been shared across the US Military Health System, fostering an organizational culture that values targeted prophylaxis for PONV.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) degrades patient experience and increases healthcare costs. Estimates of PONV range from 10% to 80%. The Apfel Simplified Score is an evidence-based instrument for determining individual risk of PONV. Scoring enables anesthesia providers to match antiemetic strategies with the calculated risk of PONV. Data were collected across 3 times. After the Apfel scoring system was automated into the electronic medical record, providers were more likely to increase PONV prophylaxis for patients at highest risk and reduce prophylaxis for patients at lowest risk. Rates of PONV remained similar at baseline (34.7%) and in the early postimplementation period (38.8%); a modest reduction was observed in the final period (26.5%). Intravenous ondansetron, the most common antiemetic at baseline, was not available in the early postimplementation period, which may partially explain the initial increase in PONV. While ondansetron was unavailable, providers began using 3 other antiemetics, a practice that persisted once intravenous ondansetron returned. The Apfel score is an evidence-based tool that providers can use to reduce the risk of PONV. This electronic tool and the reminder cards have been shared across the US Military Health System, fostering an organizational culture that values targeted prophylaxis for PONV.

Key concepts: Ondansetron, Antiemetic, Postoperative nausea and vomiting, Medicine, Nausea, Vomiting, Anesthesia, Emergency medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting During an Ondansetron Shortage. — Research Paper | ScholarLens