ScholarLens Back to search
2007•ChaptersRequires access

Protection of Traditional Knowledge: Protecting Poor Countries’ Intellectual Property?

Zhu Lan-ye

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

China’s accession to the WTO and TRIPS heralded massive changes in Chinese intellectual property (IP) law. This book asks whether all aspects of Chinese law and practice are now TRIPs compliant. The study offers both Chinese and European perspectives.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

China’s accession to the WTO and TRIPS heralded massive changes in Chinese intellectual property (IP) law. This book asks whether all aspects of Chinese law and practice are now TRIPs compliant. The study offers both Chinese and European perspectives.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

China’s accession to the WTO and TRIPS heralded massive changes in Chinese intellectual property (IP) law. This book asks whether all aspects of Chinese law and practice are now TRIPs compliant. The study offers both Chinese and European perspectives.

Key concepts: Intellectual property, TRIPS architecture, Accession, China, Traditional knowledge, International trade, TRIPS Agreement, Law and economics

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Protection of Traditional Knowledge: Protecting Poor Countries’ Intellectual Property? — Research Paper | ScholarLens