1999Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)Open access

Social policy and income distribution: An empirical analysis for the Netherlands

Koen Caminada, Kees Goudswaard

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In most OECD-countries income inequality has increased during the last two decades. In this paper, we\ninvestigate to what extent changes in the overall distribution of incomes can be attributed to social policy\nmeasures. The case for the Netherlands is particularly interesting, because the Dutch welfare state has\nbeen reformed rather fundamentally in recent years.\nThe budget incidence analysis indicates that in the period 1981-1996 inequality of adjusted disposable\nhousehold income increased sharply. The main force behind this phenomenon was a more unequal\ndistribution of market incomes, but social transfers also explain a substantial large part of the rise in\ninequality. Social security reforms indeed seem to have made the income distribution less equal.\nThe results of a more detailed analysis for 1996 on the redistributive impact of social policy and of specific\nsocial programs - using data from an unique income panel survey - can be summarised as follows:\n- The first five income deciles clearly gain from social security, while the higher deciles loose. Social\nsecurity causes a reduction in inequality by 26 to 50 percent, depending on the indicator used.\n- The public old age program and the social assistance program explain by far the largest part of\nredistribution by the social system, while the disability and unemployment programs do not have strong\nredistributive effects.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In most OECD-countries income inequality has increased during the last two decades. In this paper, we\ninvestigate to what extent changes in the overall distribution of incomes can be attributed to social policy\nmeasures. The case for the Netherlands is particularly interesting, because the Dutch welfare state has\nbeen reformed rather fundamentally in recent years.\nThe budget incidence analysis indicates that in the period 1981-1996 inequality of adjusted disposable\nhousehold income increased sharply. The main force behind this phenomenon was a more unequal\ndistribution of market incomes, but social transfers also explain a substantial large part of the rise in\ninequality. Social security reforms indeed seem to have made the income distribution less equal.\nThe results of a more detailed analysis for 1996 on the redistributive impact of social policy and of specific\nsocial programs - using data from an unique income panel survey - can be summarised as follows:\n- The first five income deciles clearly gain from social security, while the higher deciles loose. Social\nsecurity causes a reduction in inequality by 26 to 50 percent, depending on the indicator used.\n- The public old age program and the social assistance program explain by far the largest part of\nredistribution by the social system, while the disability and unemployment programs do not have strong\nredistributive effects.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In most OECD-countries income inequality has increased during the last two decades. In this paper, we\ninvestigate to what extent changes in the overall distribution of incomes can be attributed to social policy\nmeasures. The case for the Netherlands is particularly interesting, because the Dutch welfare state has\nbeen reformed rather fundamentally in recent years.\nThe budget incidence analysis indicates that in the period 1981-1996 inequality of adjusted disposable\nhousehold income increased sharply. The main force behind this phenomenon was a more unequal\ndistribution of market incomes, but social transfers also explain a substantial large part of the rise in\ninequality. Social security reforms indeed seem to have made the income distribution less equal.\nThe results of a more detailed analysis for 1996 on the redistributive impact of social policy and of specific\nsocial programs - using data from an unique income panel survey - can be summarised as follows:\n- The first five income deciles clearly gain from social security, while the higher deciles loose. Social\nsecurity causes a reduction in inequality by 26 to 50 percent, depending on the indicator used.\n- The public old age program and the social assistance program explain by far the largest part of\nredistribution by the social system, while the disability and unemployment programs do not have strong\nredistributive effects.

Key concepts: Social security, Economics, Income distribution, Unemployment, Redistribution (election), Inequality, Demographic economics, Welfare state

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Social policy and income distribution: An empirical analysis for the Netherlands — Research Paper | ScholarLens