Equality of Opportunity 1
Janet Radcliffe Richards
Abstract
Janet Radcliffe Richards
Abstract
Some people are against equality of opportunity. Most people, however, seem to take it for granted that equality of opportunity is a Good Thing we should be aiming for, and that our only problem lies in achieving it. True equality of opportunity must therefore involve special remedial treatments, or perhaps even, eventually, genetic engineering. Before any possibility arises of implementing equality of opportunity, we need a description of what would count as having achieved it. That is the first problem. The ideas that propel the main descent, in contrast, represent irre- ducibly different kinds of standard, compatible with each other, which introduce equality in different ways and imply different interpretations of opportunity, and whose confusion turns all practical discussions of equal opportunity into convoluted fallacies of equivocation. The whole appearance of an ideal of equal opportunity is produced by a series of intellectual slips into which the serpent has, appropriately, beguiled us.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Some people are against equality of opportunity. Most people, however, seem to take it for granted that equality of opportunity is a Good Thing we should be aiming for, and that our only problem lies in achieving it. True equality of opportunity must therefore involve special remedial treatments, or perhaps even, eventually, genetic engineering. Before any possibility arises of implementing equality of opportunity, we need a description of what would count as having achieved it. That is the first problem. The ideas that propel the main descent, in contrast, represent irre- ducibly different kinds of standard, compatible with each other, which introduce equality in different ways and imply different interpretations of opportunity, and whose confusion turns all practical discussions of equal opportunity into convoluted fallacies of equivocation. The whole appearance of an ideal of equal opportunity is produced by a series of intellectual slips into which the serpent has, appropriately, beguiled us.
Key concepts: Sociology, Political science