2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Equality of Opportunity 1

Janet Radcliffe Richards

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Some people are against equality of opportunity. Most people, however, seem to take it for granted that equality of opportunity is a Good Thing we should be aiming for, and that our only problem lies in achieving it. True equality of opportunity must therefore involve special remedial treatments, or perhaps even, eventually, genetic engineering. Before any possibility arises of implementing equality of opportunity, we need a description of what would count as having achieved it. That is the first problem. The ideas that propel the main descent, in contrast, represent irre- ducibly different kinds of standard, compatible with each other, which introduce equality in different ways and imply different interpretations of opportunity, and whose confusion turns all practical discussions of equal opportunity into convoluted fallacies of equivocation. The whole appearance of an ideal of equal opportunity is produced by a series of intellectual slips into which the serpent has, appropriately, beguiled us.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Some people are against equality of opportunity. Most people, however, seem to take it for granted that equality of opportunity is a Good Thing we should be aiming for, and that our only problem lies in achieving it. True equality of opportunity must therefore involve special remedial treatments, or perhaps even, eventually, genetic engineering. Before any possibility arises of implementing equality of opportunity, we need a description of what would count as having achieved it. That is the first problem. The ideas that propel the main descent, in contrast, represent irre- ducibly different kinds of standard, compatible with each other, which introduce equality in different ways and imply different interpretations of opportunity, and whose confusion turns all practical discussions of equal opportunity into convoluted fallacies of equivocation. The whole appearance of an ideal of equal opportunity is produced by a series of intellectual slips into which the serpent has, appropriately, beguiled us.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Some people are against equality of opportunity. Most people, however, seem to take it for granted that equality of opportunity is a Good Thing we should be aiming for, and that our only problem lies in achieving it. True equality of opportunity must therefore involve special remedial treatments, or perhaps even, eventually, genetic engineering. Before any possibility arises of implementing equality of opportunity, we need a description of what would count as having achieved it. That is the first problem. The ideas that propel the main descent, in contrast, represent irre- ducibly different kinds of standard, compatible with each other, which introduce equality in different ways and imply different interpretations of opportunity, and whose confusion turns all practical discussions of equal opportunity into convoluted fallacies of equivocation. The whole appearance of an ideal of equal opportunity is produced by a series of intellectual slips into which the serpent has, appropriately, beguiled us.

Key concepts: Sociology, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Equality of Opportunity 1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens