2021SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

The Importance of Proximity to the Audit Firm’s National Office to Practice Office Growth and Audit Quality

Keval Amin, Jeffrey Pittman, Zhifeng Yang, Haoran Zhu

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

We examine the role that an audit firm’s national office plays in shaping its practice offices’ economic outcomes. Given that national offices provide superior support, monitoring, and advising to physically closer offices, we expect an increase in proximity to improve practice offices’ capacity and expertise. Exploiting the introduction of new airline routes that results in a decrease in travel time between national and practice offices as an exogenous shock, we find that treated offices enjoy significant growth in their market share and their clients exhibit a significant improvement in financial reporting quality relative to pre-treatment and untreated offices. Cross-sectional tests reveal that these effects are magnified in non-Big 4 and remote Big 4 offices, offices that are more distant from the nearest SEC office, and offices that experience large travel time reductions. Moreover, we show that, after becoming more proximate to the national office, treated offices are more likely to accept inherently riskier engagements, implying that growth among treated offices is partly driven by an increase in treated offices’ ability to take on riskier engagements given their improved expertise. Collectively, these results shed light on the importance of auditors’ national offices to their practice offices.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We examine the role that an audit firm’s national office plays in shaping its practice offices’ economic outcomes. Given that national offices provide superior support, monitoring, and advising to physically closer offices, we expect an increase in proximity to improve practice offices’ capacity and expertise. Exploiting the introduction of new airline routes that results in a decrease in travel time between national and practice offices as an exogenous shock, we find that treated offices enjoy significant growth in their market share and their clients exhibit a significant improvement in financial reporting quality relative to pre-treatment and untreated offices. Cross-sectional tests reveal that these effects are magnified in non-Big 4 and remote Big 4 offices, offices that are more distant from the nearest SEC office, and offices that experience large travel time reductions. Moreover, we show that, after becoming more proximate to the national office, treated offices are more likely to accept inherently riskier engagements, implying that growth among treated offices is partly driven by an increase in treated offices’ ability to take on riskier engagements given their improved expertise. Collectively, these results shed light on the importance of auditors’ national offices to their practice offices.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We examine the role that an audit firm’s national office plays in shaping its practice offices’ economic outcomes. Given that national offices provide superior support, monitoring, and advising to physically closer offices, we expect an increase in proximity to improve practice offices’ capacity and expertise. Exploiting the introduction of new airline routes that results in a decrease in travel time between national and practice offices as an exogenous shock, we find that treated offices enjoy significant growth in their market share and their clients exhibit a significant improvement in financial reporting quality relative to pre-treatment and untreated offices. Cross-sectional tests reveal that these effects are magnified in non-Big 4 and remote Big 4 offices, offices that are more distant from the nearest SEC office, and offices that experience large travel time reductions. Moreover, we show that, after becoming more proximate to the national office, treated offices are more likely to accept inherently riskier engagements, implying that growth among treated offices is partly driven by an increase in treated offices’ ability to take on riskier engagements given their improved expertise. Collectively, these results shed light on the importance of auditors’ national offices to their practice offices.

Key concepts: Audit, Business, Quality (philosophy), Shock (circulatory), Quality audit, Accounting, Medicine, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Importance of Proximity to the Audit Firm’s National Office to Practice Office Growth and Audit Quality — Research Paper | ScholarLens