2021Unpublished venueRequires access

Philosophy of Art and Time

Sean Enda Power

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter defines temporal art as separate from other forms of art, considering some common objections. It examines how art represents time, focusing on the most-discussed artistic medium, cinema. The chapter considers two specific objections to philosophical theories of time. One is that the nature of music purports to undermine four-dimensionalism , a contemporary philosophical view of time. The other is based on Bergson’s philosophy of time, which inspired some filmmakers in their thinking about cinema. The art theorist Lessing classically divides art into two kinds—an art of space and an art of time . Perhaps what differentiates temporal artwork from spatial artwork is not the reality of what they represent. It is the possibility or imaginability of what they represent. According to Kant, aesthetic judgement involves the “free play” of the imagination. To arrive at how cinema may be a preferable form of temporal art, consider an analogy with another kind of art: realist painting.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter defines temporal art as separate from other forms of art, considering some common objections. It examines how art represents time, focusing on the most-discussed artistic medium, cinema. The chapter considers two specific objections to philosophical theories of time. One is that the nature of music purports to undermine four-dimensionalism , a contemporary philosophical view of time. The other is based on Bergson’s philosophy of time, which inspired some filmmakers in their thinking about cinema. The art theorist Lessing classically divides art into two kinds—an art of space and an art of time . Perhaps what differentiates temporal artwork from spatial artwork is not the reality of what they represent. It is the possibility or imaginability of what they represent. According to Kant, aesthetic judgement involves the “free play” of the imagination. To arrive at how cinema may be a preferable form of temporal art, consider an analogy with another kind of art: realist painting.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter defines temporal art as separate from other forms of art, considering some common objections. It examines how art represents time, focusing on the most-discussed artistic medium, cinema. The chapter considers two specific objections to philosophical theories of time. One is that the nature of music purports to undermine four-dimensionalism , a contemporary philosophical view of time. The other is based on Bergson’s philosophy of time, which inspired some filmmakers in their thinking about cinema. The art theorist Lessing classically divides art into two kinds—an art of space and an art of time . Perhaps what differentiates temporal artwork from spatial artwork is not the reality of what they represent. It is the possibility or imaginability of what they represent. According to Kant, aesthetic judgement involves the “free play” of the imagination. To arrive at how cinema may be a preferable form of temporal art, consider an analogy with another kind of art: realist painting.

Key concepts: Philosophy, Art

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Philosophy of Art and Time — Research Paper | ScholarLens