2017•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

The Control of Unfair Contract Terms

Hein D. Kötz

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Where the overall validity of a contract is not in doubt, a party may be allowed to rely on the invalidity of one of its clauses because it has not become part of the contract or is found to be ‘inappropriate’, ‘unreasonable’, ‘unfair’, contravenes ‘good faith’ or in some other way ‘grossly disadvantages’ a party. Some legal systems allow the judge to strike down such clauses only where they have been preformulated by one party and thus form part of its ‘standard terms of business’. Judicial control may also be limited to cases where the clause disadvantages a ‘consumer’. The chapter discusses the purposes of the judicial control of such clauses and the reasons on which their ‘unfairness’ may be based. In a final section the chapter deals with the preventive control of such clauses by way of criminal sanctions, group actions, and administrative controls.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Where the overall validity of a contract is not in doubt, a party may be allowed to rely on the invalidity of one of its clauses because it has not become part of the contract or is found to be ‘inappropriate’, ‘unreasonable’, ‘unfair’, contravenes ‘good faith’ or in some other way ‘grossly disadvantages’ a party. Some legal systems allow the judge to strike down such clauses only where they have been preformulated by one party and thus form part of its ‘standard terms of business’. Judicial control may also be limited to cases where the clause disadvantages a ‘consumer’. The chapter discusses the purposes of the judicial control of such clauses and the reasons on which their ‘unfairness’ may be based. In a final section the chapter deals with the preventive control of such clauses by way of criminal sanctions, group actions, and administrative controls.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Where the overall validity of a contract is not in doubt, a party may be allowed to rely on the invalidity of one of its clauses because it has not become part of the contract or is found to be ‘inappropriate’, ‘unreasonable’, ‘unfair’, contravenes ‘good faith’ or in some other way ‘grossly disadvantages’ a party. Some legal systems allow the judge to strike down such clauses only where they have been preformulated by one party and thus form part of its ‘standard terms of business’. Judicial control may also be limited to cases where the clause disadvantages a ‘consumer’. The chapter discusses the purposes of the judicial control of such clauses and the reasons on which their ‘unfairness’ may be based. In a final section the chapter deals with the preventive control of such clauses by way of criminal sanctions, group actions, and administrative controls.

Key concepts: Sanctions, Control (management), Good faith, Law and economics, Law, Business, Bad faith, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Control of Unfair Contract Terms — Research Paper | ScholarLens