Freedom’s Accounts
Stephen P. Knadler
Abstract
Stephen P. Knadler
Abstract
Stephen Knadler challenges the alignment of physical mobility with freedom by elaborating on the debt crisis and exclusion of the mobile freeman discursively constructed as a semi-citizen under mid-century racial capitalism. In doing so, he explores the limits to aligning African American autobiographical writing primarily with the slave narrative by making a case for the emergence of a new autobiographical genre that he calls the semi-citzenship narrative. Emerging in the decade before the Civil War and written predominantly, though not exclusively, by men, this genre complicates “understanding of the relation among antebellum citizenship making, Black freedom struggles and racial capitalism.” The semi-citizenship narrative, he argues, constitutes an ignored history of the “afterlife of free labor” that unsettles the racialization of Blackness as social and legal death and whiteness as free waged labor and citizenship. That unsettling is staged through a “quasi-citizenship” articulated in accounts of the freeman’s indebtedness and “excluding out” by writers such as William Grimes, Samuel Ringgold Ward, Thomas Smallwood, and Austin Steward. Knadler argues that these writers were using their narratives to account for the “unfolding and incomplete transition of the enslaved into a third term, a so-called free person who was not quite a citizen nor yet enslaved.”
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Stephen Knadler challenges the alignment of physical mobility with freedom by elaborating on the debt crisis and exclusion of the mobile freeman discursively constructed as a semi-citizen under mid-century racial capitalism. In doing so, he explores the limits to aligning African American autobiographical writing primarily with the slave narrative by making a case for the emergence of a new autobiographical genre that he calls the semi-citzenship narrative. Emerging in the decade before the Civil War and written predominantly, though not exclusively, by men, this genre complicates “understanding of the relation among antebellum citizenship making, Black freedom struggles and racial capitalism.” The semi-citizenship narrative, he argues, constitutes an ignored history of the “afterlife of free labor” that unsettles the racialization of Blackness as social and legal death and whiteness as free waged labor and citizenship. That unsettling is staged through a “quasi-citizenship” articulated in accounts of the freeman’s indebtedness and “excluding out” by writers such as William Grimes, Samuel Ringgold Ward, Thomas Smallwood, and Austin Steward. Knadler argues that these writers were using their narratives to account for the “unfolding and incomplete transition of the enslaved into a third term, a so-called free person who was not quite a citizen nor yet enslaved.”
Key concepts: Citizenship, Narrative, Capitalism, Racialization, Sociology, Gender studies, Aesthetics, History