2021•Filozofija i drustvoOpen access

Dialectics as immanent critique. Or, dialectics as both ontology and epistemology with a practical intention

Shijun Tong

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

This response to Asger S?rensen?s paper From Ontology to Epistemology: Tong, Mao and Hegel is made on the basis of a reflection on the author?s intellectual development with special reference to the idea of ?dialectics?. This development is mainly composed of three periods, in which the author formed his strong antipathy toward dialectics as a mere tool of power (in the 1970s), learnt to understand the importance of ?dialogical logic? in providing conceptual tools for human knowledge of a type of reality which is both objective and subjective - human practices (in the 1980s) - and attempted to understand the ?dialectics of rationalization? by integrating ?dialectics? in the Western tradition of Critical Theory with the Chinese tradition of ?dialectics? systematically interpreted by Feng Qi (1915-1995) since the 1990s.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This response to Asger S?rensen?s paper From Ontology to Epistemology: Tong, Mao and Hegel is made on the basis of a reflection on the author?s intellectual development with special reference to the idea of ?dialectics?. This development is mainly composed of three periods, in which the author formed his strong antipathy toward dialectics as a mere tool of power (in the 1970s), learnt to understand the importance of ?dialogical logic? in providing conceptual tools for human knowledge of a type of reality which is both objective and subjective - human practices (in the 1980s) - and attempted to understand the ?dialectics of rationalization? by integrating ?dialectics? in the Western tradition of Critical Theory with the Chinese tradition of ?dialectics? systematically interpreted by Feng Qi (1915-1995) since the 1990s.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This response to Asger S?rensen?s paper From Ontology to Epistemology: Tong, Mao and Hegel is made on the basis of a reflection on the author?s intellectual development with special reference to the idea of ?dialectics?. This development is mainly composed of three periods, in which the author formed his strong antipathy toward dialectics as a mere tool of power (in the 1970s), learnt to understand the importance of ?dialogical logic? in providing conceptual tools for human knowledge of a type of reality which is both objective and subjective - human practices (in the 1980s) - and attempted to understand the ?dialectics of rationalization? by integrating ?dialectics? in the Western tradition of Critical Theory with the Chinese tradition of ?dialectics? systematically interpreted by Feng Qi (1915-1995) since the 1990s.

Key concepts: Dialectic, Epistemology, Hegelianism, Ontology, Dialogical self, Philosophy, Antipathy, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dialectics as immanent critique. Or, dialectics as both ontology and epistemology with a practical intention — Research Paper | ScholarLens