2002Unpublished venueRequires access

Privity of Contract 2000

Robert Merkin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Robert Merkin’s book opens with Viscount Haldane’s remark ‘that only a person who is a party to a contract can sue on it’. Since they give no consideration, historically, third parties are not a party to the contract and are, therefore, barred from recovery. In contract, consideration moves from the promisee who, in behalf of the third party, may chart the unhappy course between the Scylla and Charybdis of specific performance and estoppel. Merkin analyses how Great Britain’s Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act, 1999, cuts through this third party conundrum by abrogating the Doctrine of Privity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Robert Merkin’s book opens with Viscount Haldane’s remark ‘that only a person who is a party to a contract can sue on it’. Since they give no consideration, historically, third parties are not a party to the contract and are, therefore, barred from recovery. In contract, consideration moves from the promisee who, in behalf of the third party, may chart the unhappy course between the Scylla and Charybdis of specific performance and estoppel. Merkin analyses how Great Britain’s Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act, 1999, cuts through this third party conundrum by abrogating the Doctrine of Privity.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Robert Merkin’s book opens with Viscount Haldane’s remark ‘that only a person who is a party to a contract can sue on it’. Since they give no consideration, historically, third parties are not a party to the contract and are, therefore, barred from recovery. In contract, consideration moves from the promisee who, in behalf of the third party, may chart the unhappy course between the Scylla and Charybdis of specific performance and estoppel. Merkin analyses how Great Britain’s Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act, 1999, cuts through this third party conundrum by abrogating the Doctrine of Privity.

Key concepts: Privity of contract, Business, Contract management, Exclusion clause, Marketing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Privity of Contract 2000 — Research Paper | ScholarLens