Giorgio Colombo, Ludovico Furlan, Giulia Colombo
Abstract
To the Editor The study by Dr Righini and colleagues1 validated the use of an age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff level to rule out pulmonary embolism. The 6 different D-dimer assays used in the study were demonstrated to be equivalent in a previous meta-analysis.2
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
To the Editor The study by Dr Righini and colleagues1 validated the use of an age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff level to rule out pulmonary embolism. The 6 different D-dimer assays used in the study were demonstrated to be equivalent in a previous meta-analysis.2
Key concepts: Medicine, D-dimer, Cutoff, Pulmonary embolism, Age adjustment, Internal medicine, Cardiology, Epidemiology