2002Asian perspectiveRequires access

A Comparative Study of Regionalism in East Asia and the Americas

Young Jong Choi, Nae Young Lee

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

This article approaches East Asian regionalism from a comparative perspective to explore the causes of institutional underdevelopment and regionalism’s future prospects. While pointing out the theoretical problems involved in a comparison of East Asia with Western Europe, the article compares East Asia with the American region. Four key conditions are identified as being responsible for the success of regional integration: functional demands, leadership, common exigencies, and common identity. Ensuing comparative analysis shows that these four factors can explain the varying degrees of institutional development in East Asia and the Americas. The conclusion predicts that the recent interest in bilateral free trade areas in East Asia will accelera te regional integration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article approaches East Asian regionalism from a comparative perspective to explore the causes of institutional underdevelopment and regionalism’s future prospects. While pointing out the theoretical problems involved in a comparison of East Asia with Western Europe, the article compares East Asia with the American region. Four key conditions are identified as being responsible for the success of regional integration: functional demands, leadership, common exigencies, and common identity. Ensuing comparative analysis shows that these four factors can explain the varying degrees of institutional development in East Asia and the Americas. The conclusion predicts that the recent interest in bilateral free trade areas in East Asia will accelera te regional integration.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article approaches East Asian regionalism from a comparative perspective to explore the causes of institutional underdevelopment and regionalism’s future prospects. While pointing out the theoretical problems involved in a comparison of East Asia with Western Europe, the article compares East Asia with the American region. Four key conditions are identified as being responsible for the success of regional integration: functional demands, leadership, common exigencies, and common identity. Ensuing comparative analysis shows that these four factors can explain the varying degrees of institutional development in East Asia and the Americas. The conclusion predicts that the recent interest in bilateral free trade areas in East Asia will accelera te regional integration.

Key concepts: Regionalism (politics), East Asia, Underdevelopment, Political science, Regional integration, Geography, Economic geography, Development economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparative Study of Regionalism in East Asia and the Americas — Research Paper | ScholarLens