2019National Bureau of Economic ResearchOpen access

A Requiem for “Blame It on Beijing”: Interpreting Rotating Global Current Account Surpluses

Menzie Chinn, Hiro Ito

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

Global current account imbalances have reappeared, although the extent and distribution of these imbalances are noticeably different from those experienced in the middle of the last decade.What does that recurrence mean for our understanding of the origin and nature of such imbalances?Will imbalances persist over time?Informed by empirical estimates of the determinants of current account imbalances encompassing the period after the global recession, we find that -as beforethe observable manifestations of the factors driving the global saving glut have limited explanatory power for the time series variation in imbalances.Fiscal factors determine imbalances, and have accounted for a noticeable share of the recent variation in imbalances, including in the U.S. and Germany.For advanced economies, the financial component of the current account has been playing an increasing role to determine the movements of the account.Examining observable policy actions, it is clear that net official flows have been associated with some share of imbalances, although tracing out the motivations for intervention is difficult.Looking forward, it is clear that policy can influence global imbalances, although some component of the U.S. deficit will likely remain given the U.S. role in generating safe assets.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Global current account imbalances have reappeared, although the extent and distribution of these imbalances are noticeably different from those experienced in the middle of the last decade.What does that recurrence mean for our understanding of the origin and nature of such imbalances?Will imbalances persist over time?Informed by empirical estimates of the determinants of current account imbalances encompassing the period after the global recession, we find that -as beforethe observable manifestations of the factors driving the global saving glut have limited explanatory power for the time series variation in imbalances.Fiscal factors determine imbalances, and have accounted for a noticeable share of the recent variation in imbalances, including in the U.S. and Germany.For advanced economies, the financial component of the current account has been playing an increasing role to determine the movements of the account.Examining observable policy actions, it is clear that net official flows have been associated with some share of imbalances, although tracing out the motivations for intervention is difficult.Looking forward, it is clear that policy can influence global imbalances, although some component of the U.S. deficit will likely remain given the U.S. role in generating safe assets.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Global current account imbalances have reappeared, although the extent and distribution of these imbalances are noticeably different from those experienced in the middle of the last decade.What does that recurrence mean for our understanding of the origin and nature of such imbalances?Will imbalances persist over time?Informed by empirical estimates of the determinants of current account imbalances encompassing the period after the global recession, we find that -as beforethe observable manifestations of the factors driving the global saving glut have limited explanatory power for the time series variation in imbalances.Fiscal factors determine imbalances, and have accounted for a noticeable share of the recent variation in imbalances, including in the U.S. and Germany.For advanced economies, the financial component of the current account has been playing an increasing role to determine the movements of the account.Examining observable policy actions, it is clear that net official flows have been associated with some share of imbalances, although tracing out the motivations for intervention is difficult.Looking forward, it is clear that policy can influence global imbalances, although some component of the U.S. deficit will likely remain given the U.S. role in generating safe assets.

Key concepts: Beijing, Blame, Current (fluid), Political science, Geography, Economics, China, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Requiem for “Blame It on Beijing”: Interpreting Rotating Global Current Account Surpluses — Research Paper | ScholarLens