Selection of advantaged and disadvantaged South African students- for university admission
Kate. Skuy, Mervyn, Zolezzi, Steve Steve, Mentis, Mandia., Fridjhon, Peter Cockcroft
Abstract
Kate. Skuy, Mervyn, Zolezzi, Steve Steve, Mentis, Mandia., Fridjhon, Peter Cockcroft
Abstract
With the dismantling of apartheid and the opening of universities to people from sociopolitically disadvantaged communities, the issue of relevant selection procedures has become increasingly pressing in South Africa. This study aimed at exploring the relative value of various predictots for disadvantaged versus advantaged students. Subjects comprised the 26 students enrolled in a pre-university Faculty of Commerce bridging yesr, 18 of whom were ftom educationally disadvantaged backgrounds. Generally, the academic success of disadvantaged, was considerably less predictable than that advantaged students. Further, universally-used matriculation criterion was not a significant predictor for either the disadvantaged or the advantaged, while the dynamic and process measures applied were also not significant predictors for disadvantaged students. The results were seen as supporting the need for an alternative approach to selection. and a of enrichment programmes themselves.
OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
With the dismantling of apartheid and the opening of universities to people from sociopolitically disadvantaged communities, the issue of relevant selection procedures has become increasingly pressing in South Africa. This study aimed at exploring the relative value of various predictots for disadvantaged versus advantaged students. Subjects comprised the 26 students enrolled in a pre-university Faculty of Commerce bridging yesr, 18 of whom were ftom educationally disadvantaged backgrounds. Generally, the academic success of disadvantaged, was considerably less predictable than that advantaged students. Further, universally-used matriculation criterion was not a significant predictor for either the disadvantaged or the advantaged, while the dynamic and process measures applied were also not significant predictors for disadvantaged students. The results were seen as supporting the need for an alternative approach to selection. and a of enrichment programmes themselves.
Key concepts: Disadvantaged, Matriculation, Selection (genetic algorithm), Higher education, Demographic economics, Psychology, Sociology, Mathematics education