1996South African Journal of Higher EducationOpen access

Selection of advantaged and disadvantaged South African students- for university admission

Kate. Skuy, Mervyn, Zolezzi, Steve Steve, Mentis, Mandia., Fridjhon, Peter Cockcroft

Open full text 14 citations

Abstract

With the dismantling of apartheid and the opening of universities to people from sociopolitically disadvantaged communities, the issue of relevant selection procedures has become increasingly pressing in South Africa. This study aimed at exploring the relative value of various predictots for disadvantaged versus advantaged students. Subjects comprised the 26 students enrolled in a pre-university Faculty of Commerce bridging yesr, 18 of whom were ftom educationally disadvantaged backgrounds. Generally, the academic success of disadvantaged, was considerably less predictable than that advantaged students. Further, universally-used matriculation criterion was not a significant predictor for either the disadvantaged or the advantaged, while the dynamic and process measures applied were also not significant predictors for disadvantaged students. The results were seen as supporting the need for an alternative approach to selection. and a of enrichment programmes themselves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

With the dismantling of apartheid and the opening of universities to people from sociopolitically disadvantaged communities, the issue of relevant selection procedures has become increasingly pressing in South Africa. This study aimed at exploring the relative value of various predictots for disadvantaged versus advantaged students. Subjects comprised the 26 students enrolled in a pre-university Faculty of Commerce bridging yesr, 18 of whom were ftom educationally disadvantaged backgrounds. Generally, the academic success of disadvantaged, was considerably less predictable than that advantaged students. Further, universally-used matriculation criterion was not a significant predictor for either the disadvantaged or the advantaged, while the dynamic and process measures applied were also not significant predictors for disadvantaged students. The results were seen as supporting the need for an alternative approach to selection. and a of enrichment programmes themselves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

With the dismantling of apartheid and the opening of universities to people from sociopolitically disadvantaged communities, the issue of relevant selection procedures has become increasingly pressing in South Africa. This study aimed at exploring the relative value of various predictots for disadvantaged versus advantaged students. Subjects comprised the 26 students enrolled in a pre-university Faculty of Commerce bridging yesr, 18 of whom were ftom educationally disadvantaged backgrounds. Generally, the academic success of disadvantaged, was considerably less predictable than that advantaged students. Further, universally-used matriculation criterion was not a significant predictor for either the disadvantaged or the advantaged, while the dynamic and process measures applied were also not significant predictors for disadvantaged students. The results were seen as supporting the need for an alternative approach to selection. and a of enrichment programmes themselves.

Key concepts: Disadvantaged, Matriculation, Selection (genetic algorithm), Higher education, Demographic economics, Psychology, Sociology, Mathematics education

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Selection of advantaged and disadvantaged South African students- for university admission — Research Paper | ScholarLens