1967•Physical ReviewRequires access

Lorentz-Invariant Localization for Elementary Systems

Juan Carlos Gallardo, Andrés J. Kálnay, Salomón H. Risemberg

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

Philips has axiomatically defined sets of localized states which are Lorentz-invariant (while Newton-Wigner sets of localized states are not) and has divided these sets into three classes. Philips's conjecture concerning spin-zero localized states, namely, that the postulates define the sets of localized states in a unique way, is proved to be incorrect by finding a class-III set that satisfies Philips's postulates. Philips's work is discussed and his calculations (spin-zero case) are repeated without using some (explicit and implicit) unnecessary hypotheses. These calculations are also extended to the spin-\textonehalf{} case, for which it is proved that there are only class-III sets of localized states. The results are discussed. Incidentally, an explicit form of the effects induced by a Lorentz transformation on representation space is found for both the spin-zero and spin-\textonehalf{} cases.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Philips has axiomatically defined sets of localized states which are Lorentz-invariant (while Newton-Wigner sets of localized states are not) and has divided these sets into three classes. Philips's conjecture concerning spin-zero localized states, namely, that the postulates define the sets of localized states in a unique way, is proved to be incorrect by finding a class-III set that satisfies Philips's postulates. Philips's work is discussed and his calculations (spin-zero case) are repeated without using some (explicit and implicit) unnecessary hypotheses. These calculations are also extended to the spin-\textonehalf{} case, for which it is proved that there are only class-III sets of localized states. The results are discussed. Incidentally, an explicit form of the effects induced by a Lorentz transformation on representation space is found for both the spin-zero and spin-\textonehalf{} cases.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Philips has axiomatically defined sets of localized states which are Lorentz-invariant (while Newton-Wigner sets of localized states are not) and has divided these sets into three classes. Philips's conjecture concerning spin-zero localized states, namely, that the postulates define the sets of localized states in a unique way, is proved to be incorrect by finding a class-III set that satisfies Philips's postulates. Philips's work is discussed and his calculations (spin-zero case) are repeated without using some (explicit and implicit) unnecessary hypotheses. These calculations are also extended to the spin-\textonehalf{} case, for which it is proved that there are only class-III sets of localized states. The results are discussed. Incidentally, an explicit form of the effects induced by a Lorentz transformation on representation space is found for both the spin-zero and spin-\textonehalf{} cases.

Key concepts: Lorentz transformation, Invariant (physics), Physics, Lorentz covariance, Mathematical physics, Pure mathematics, Conjecture, Theoretical physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Lorentz-Invariant Localization for Elementary Systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens