An Empirical Analysis on Trade Specialization, Intra-Industry Trade, and Comparative Advantage of Cultural Products between Korea and China
Tian Xiu, Chae‐Deug Yi
Abstract
Tian Xiu, Chae‐Deug Yi
Abstract
Purpose There have many researches between China and Korea in culture service however;there has never been a study which analyzes the cultural products recently. And it is necessary to know what kind of cultural products have comparative advantage for cultural products in the Korean-Chinese cultural products. This paper is going to develop Korean cultural products and expand the market share of Korean cultural products in Chinese market. Design/Methodology/Approach We used the data of examines korean’s 55 cultural export items versus;using HSK 4 digit codes from 2014 to 2019. With using the recent international trade between Korea and China;this study tested empirically several trade structure tests such as trade intensity;intra-industry trade index;and realized comparative advantage(RCA) index. Findings As empirical results of cultural products between Korea and China in the trade structure ;Korea has more specialized import trade. In the field of cultural products;Korea has a comparative advantage over audio products and products related to movies;and has many export-specific products. The data show that the export structure of minority cultural products is changing and the export structure of Korean cultural products is also changing. In particular;Korea is competitive in design;design;and label design made of medium or cardboard. It seems that there is a comparative advantage over products that contain technical elements over simple labor-intensive materials. Research Implications In the future;Korea will have to develop and produce products that contain more technological elements and continue to specialize in exports of products with a comparative advantage. but the completion of the study could be improved by analyzing more detailed product item statistics.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Purpose There have many researches between China and Korea in culture service however;there has never been a study which analyzes the cultural products recently. And it is necessary to know what kind of cultural products have comparative advantage for cultural products in the Korean-Chinese cultural products. This paper is going to develop Korean cultural products and expand the market share of Korean cultural products in Chinese market. Design/Methodology/Approach We used the data of examines korean’s 55 cultural export items versus;using HSK 4 digit codes from 2014 to 2019. With using the recent international trade between Korea and China;this study tested empirically several trade structure tests such as trade intensity;intra-industry trade index;and realized comparative advantage(RCA) index. Findings As empirical results of cultural products between Korea and China in the trade structure ;Korea has more specialized import trade. In the field of cultural products;Korea has a comparative advantage over audio products and products related to movies;and has many export-specific products. The data show that the export structure of minority cultural products is changing and the export structure of Korean cultural products is also changing. In particular;Korea is competitive in design;design;and label design made of medium or cardboard. It seems that there is a comparative advantage over products that contain technical elements over simple labor-intensive materials. Research Implications In the future;Korea will have to develop and produce products that contain more technological elements and continue to specialize in exports of products with a comparative advantage. but the completion of the study could be improved by analyzing more detailed product item statistics.
Key concepts: China, Comparative advantage, Intra-industry trade, International trade, Economics, Business, Economic geography, International economics