2018•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Social Interactions and Stigmatized Behavior

Xi Chen, David E. Sahn, Xiaobo Zhang

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Despite the resultant disutility, some people, in particular, the poor, are engaged in behaviors that carry social stigma. Empirical studies on stigmatized behavior are rare, largely due to the formidable challenges of collecting data on stigmatized goods and services. In this paper, we add to this limited empirical evidence by examining the behavior of donating blood plasma in exchange for cash rewards in China. We do so using two primary data sets: the first is a three-wave, census‐type household survey that enables us to examine the evolving patterns and determinants of donating plasma. The second is data on detailed gift exchange records of all households.The data allow us to define reference groups, measure the intensity of social interactions, and identify peer effects using a novel network structure‐based instrumental variable strategy. We find that peer effects influence decisions to donate plasma. For example, a one‐standard‐deviation increase in income from donating plasma in the peer group increases the value of own plasma donation by 0.15 standard deviations. Families with sons have more incentives to donate plasma to offset the escalated costs of getting their sons married in a tight marriage market that favors girls.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Despite the resultant disutility, some people, in particular, the poor, are engaged in behaviors that carry social stigma. Empirical studies on stigmatized behavior are rare, largely due to the formidable challenges of collecting data on stigmatized goods and services. In this paper, we add to this limited empirical evidence by examining the behavior of donating blood plasma in exchange for cash rewards in China. We do so using two primary data sets: the first is a three-wave, census‐type household survey that enables us to examine the evolving patterns and determinants of donating plasma. The second is data on detailed gift exchange records of all households.The data allow us to define reference groups, measure the intensity of social interactions, and identify peer effects using a novel network structure‐based instrumental variable strategy. We find that peer effects influence decisions to donate plasma. For example, a one‐standard‐deviation increase in income from donating plasma in the peer group increases the value of own plasma donation by 0.15 standard deviations. Families with sons have more incentives to donate plasma to offset the escalated costs of getting their sons married in a tight marriage market that favors girls.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Despite the resultant disutility, some people, in particular, the poor, are engaged in behaviors that carry social stigma. Empirical studies on stigmatized behavior are rare, largely due to the formidable challenges of collecting data on stigmatized goods and services. In this paper, we add to this limited empirical evidence by examining the behavior of donating blood plasma in exchange for cash rewards in China. We do so using two primary data sets: the first is a three-wave, census‐type household survey that enables us to examine the evolving patterns and determinants of donating plasma. The second is data on detailed gift exchange records of all households.The data allow us to define reference groups, measure the intensity of social interactions, and identify peer effects using a novel network structure‐based instrumental variable strategy. We find that peer effects influence decisions to donate plasma. For example, a one‐standard‐deviation increase in income from donating plasma in the peer group increases the value of own plasma donation by 0.15 standard deviations. Families with sons have more incentives to donate plasma to offset the escalated costs of getting their sons married in a tight marriage market that favors girls.

Key concepts: Incentive, Donation, Cash, Economics, Survey data collection, Peer effects, Instrumental variable, Demographic economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Social Interactions and Stigmatized Behavior — Research Paper | ScholarLens