2019SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Examining Risk Governance Practices in Global Financial Institutions: The Adoption of Risk Appetite Statements

Walter Gontarek

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Heightened risk governance standards have become increasingly prevalent in financial institutions following the global financial crisis, apportioning greater responsibilities upon board directors. One such responsibility of the board is the requirement to formally articulate and monitor firm-wide risk appetite. For the first time, this study probes the risk appetite practices of global financial institutions, collected through a series of semi-structured interviews with risk governance actors. We find that the practice of establishing firm-wide risk appetite has a profound impact upon firms’ activities. Before the crisis, many boards lacked a clear understanding of risk profiles, limiting effective internal monitoring. Following the adoption of risk appetite, firms appear to improve monitoring and take into account aggregate risk levels. Moreover, there are signs that the cascading of risk appetite may contribute to improved risk conduct levels. This research is relevant to academics, providing insight for research into this emerging board-level practice. For practitioners, this study offers a unique lens to benchmark their monitoring activities for the first time.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Heightened risk governance standards have become increasingly prevalent in financial institutions following the global financial crisis, apportioning greater responsibilities upon board directors. One such responsibility of the board is the requirement to formally articulate and monitor firm-wide risk appetite. For the first time, this study probes the risk appetite practices of global financial institutions, collected through a series of semi-structured interviews with risk governance actors. We find that the practice of establishing firm-wide risk appetite has a profound impact upon firms’ activities. Before the crisis, many boards lacked a clear understanding of risk profiles, limiting effective internal monitoring. Following the adoption of risk appetite, firms appear to improve monitoring and take into account aggregate risk levels. Moreover, there are signs that the cascading of risk appetite may contribute to improved risk conduct levels. This research is relevant to academics, providing insight for research into this emerging board-level practice. For practitioners, this study offers a unique lens to benchmark their monitoring activities for the first time.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Heightened risk governance standards have become increasingly prevalent in financial institutions following the global financial crisis, apportioning greater responsibilities upon board directors. One such responsibility of the board is the requirement to formally articulate and monitor firm-wide risk appetite. For the first time, this study probes the risk appetite practices of global financial institutions, collected through a series of semi-structured interviews with risk governance actors. We find that the practice of establishing firm-wide risk appetite has a profound impact upon firms’ activities. Before the crisis, many boards lacked a clear understanding of risk profiles, limiting effective internal monitoring. Following the adoption of risk appetite, firms appear to improve monitoring and take into account aggregate risk levels. Moreover, there are signs that the cascading of risk appetite may contribute to improved risk conduct levels. This research is relevant to academics, providing insight for research into this emerging board-level practice. For practitioners, this study offers a unique lens to benchmark their monitoring activities for the first time.

Key concepts: Risk appetite, Business, Corporate governance, Financial crisis, Accounting, Risk management, Financial risk management, Risk governance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Examining Risk Governance Practices in Global Financial Institutions: The Adoption of Risk Appetite Statements — Research Paper | ScholarLens