2015The Journal of InvestingRequires access

Mutual Fund Tournaments:Do Mid-Year Winners Still Compete?

Bruno R. Arthur, Monika K. Rabarison

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

No consensus has emerged from previous studies on the risk-taking behavior of mutual fund managers in response to their relative performance. However, a number of authors commonly view the mutual fund industry as having a yearly tournament. Some managers have ranking objectives: they tend to tweak their risk levels in the second part of the year according to their performance at mid-year. If there is tournament behavior among mutual fund managers, the best way to see it should be to look at those funds that have a chance of winning. Using U.S. domestic equity fund data from 1999 through 2009, the authors find that managers with the best performance at mid-year indeed have this behavior. Furthermore, the results imply that larger mid-year risk shifting is related to higher cumulative return in the second part of the year. There is not enough evidence, however, on whether risk shifting helps improve fund cumulative return over the entire year.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

No consensus has emerged from previous studies on the risk-taking behavior of mutual fund managers in response to their relative performance. However, a number of authors commonly view the mutual fund industry as having a yearly tournament. Some managers have ranking objectives: they tend to tweak their risk levels in the second part of the year according to their performance at mid-year. If there is tournament behavior among mutual fund managers, the best way to see it should be to look at those funds that have a chance of winning. Using U.S. domestic equity fund data from 1999 through 2009, the authors find that managers with the best performance at mid-year indeed have this behavior. Furthermore, the results imply that larger mid-year risk shifting is related to higher cumulative return in the second part of the year. There is not enough evidence, however, on whether risk shifting helps improve fund cumulative return over the entire year.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

No consensus has emerged from previous studies on the risk-taking behavior of mutual fund managers in response to their relative performance. However, a number of authors commonly view the mutual fund industry as having a yearly tournament. Some managers have ranking objectives: they tend to tweak their risk levels in the second part of the year according to their performance at mid-year. If there is tournament behavior among mutual fund managers, the best way to see it should be to look at those funds that have a chance of winning. Using U.S. domestic equity fund data from 1999 through 2009, the authors find that managers with the best performance at mid-year indeed have this behavior. Furthermore, the results imply that larger mid-year risk shifting is related to higher cumulative return in the second part of the year. There is not enough evidence, however, on whether risk shifting helps improve fund cumulative return over the entire year.

Key concepts: Mutual fund, Economics, Business, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mutual Fund Tournaments:Do Mid-Year Winners Still Compete? — Research Paper | ScholarLens