A comparison of models for correcting astronomical atmospheric refraction
Daochun Yu, Haitao Li, Baoquan Li
Abstract
Daochun Yu, Haitao Li, Baoquan Li
Abstract
The quantitative evaluation of the models for correcting astronomical atmospheric refraction is very important for actual astronomical observation applications. In this work, six astronomical atmospheric refraction correction models are reviewed, including the linear model, the exponential model, the double exponential model, the Hopfield model, the accurate segmented model and the astronomical atmospheric refraction series expansion model. The systematic errors and random errors of the models are calculated for comparison. The application scope of each model is given for future applications.1
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The quantitative evaluation of the models for correcting astronomical atmospheric refraction is very important for actual astronomical observation applications. In this work, six astronomical atmospheric refraction correction models are reviewed, including the linear model, the exponential model, the double exponential model, the Hopfield model, the accurate segmented model and the astronomical atmospheric refraction series expansion model. The systematic errors and random errors of the models are calculated for comparison. The application scope of each model is given for future applications.1
Key concepts: Atmospheric refraction, Refraction, Atmospheric model, Atmospheric models, Exponential function, Series (stratigraphy), Scope (computer science), Atmospheric correction