2021Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Prolegomenon to Part III

A P Simester

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of Part III of the book, which focuses on the principles of culpability and wrongdoing in criminal law. The culpability principle mandates that conviction of a criminal offence, or at least of a stigmatic criminal offence, should not normally occur unless the accused is (morally) culpable with respect to committing that offence. The wrongdoing and culpability principles are intertwined. Paradigmatically, one does not convict defendants of ‘being a criminal’; one convicts them of a named wrong. Ultimately, a full account of culpability in the criminal law demands an account of the relationship between culpability, wrongdoing, mens rea, and defences: and of how the criminal law reflects that; or at least, of how Anglo-American law would reflect that, were it to satisfy the culpability principle.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter provides an overview of Part III of the book, which focuses on the principles of culpability and wrongdoing in criminal law. The culpability principle mandates that conviction of a criminal offence, or at least of a stigmatic criminal offence, should not normally occur unless the accused is (morally) culpable with respect to committing that offence. The wrongdoing and culpability principles are intertwined. Paradigmatically, one does not convict defendants of ‘being a criminal’; one convicts them of a named wrong. Ultimately, a full account of culpability in the criminal law demands an account of the relationship between culpability, wrongdoing, mens rea, and defences: and of how the criminal law reflects that; or at least, of how Anglo-American law would reflect that, were it to satisfy the culpability principle.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter provides an overview of Part III of the book, which focuses on the principles of culpability and wrongdoing in criminal law. The culpability principle mandates that conviction of a criminal offence, or at least of a stigmatic criminal offence, should not normally occur unless the accused is (morally) culpable with respect to committing that offence. The wrongdoing and culpability principles are intertwined. Paradigmatically, one does not convict defendants of ‘being a criminal’; one convicts them of a named wrong. Ultimately, a full account of culpability in the criminal law demands an account of the relationship between culpability, wrongdoing, mens rea, and defences: and of how the criminal law reflects that; or at least, of how Anglo-American law would reflect that, were it to satisfy the culpability principle.

Key concepts: Culpability, Wrongdoing, Criminal law, Law, Conviction, Criminology, Mens rea, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prolegomenon to Part III — Research Paper | ScholarLens