2021Unpublished venueRequires access

Philosophies of elitism and anti-elitism

Conrad Hughes

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter outlines the recent history of thinking on elitism in terms of politics and education. The chapter is divided into three sections: pro-elitist political philosophies, which discuss the Italian pragmatist school (Pareto, Mosca, Michels) and cultural elitism (T.S. Eliot and E.D. Hirsch, among others); anti-elitist political philosophies (mainly the American schools from the Second World War to the present day, covering the ideas of Wright Mills, Hunter, Burnham, Ferguson, Putnam and Dye); anti-cultural elitism (the schools of critical theory and postcolonialism) and, finally, foundational discourses on education and elitism (Bourdieu, Freire and Hirsch). The chapter compares political and educational elitism and anti-elitism to establish a number of core findings, essentially opposing three types of elitism (meritocratic, plutocratic and cultural) with three types of anti-elitism (egalitarianism, Marxism and anti-cultural elitism).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter outlines the recent history of thinking on elitism in terms of politics and education. The chapter is divided into three sections: pro-elitist political philosophies, which discuss the Italian pragmatist school (Pareto, Mosca, Michels) and cultural elitism (T.S. Eliot and E.D. Hirsch, among others); anti-elitist political philosophies (mainly the American schools from the Second World War to the present day, covering the ideas of Wright Mills, Hunter, Burnham, Ferguson, Putnam and Dye); anti-cultural elitism (the schools of critical theory and postcolonialism) and, finally, foundational discourses on education and elitism (Bourdieu, Freire and Hirsch). The chapter compares political and educational elitism and anti-elitism to establish a number of core findings, essentially opposing three types of elitism (meritocratic, plutocratic and cultural) with three types of anti-elitism (egalitarianism, Marxism and anti-cultural elitism).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter outlines the recent history of thinking on elitism in terms of politics and education. The chapter is divided into three sections: pro-elitist political philosophies, which discuss the Italian pragmatist school (Pareto, Mosca, Michels) and cultural elitism (T.S. Eliot and E.D. Hirsch, among others); anti-elitist political philosophies (mainly the American schools from the Second World War to the present day, covering the ideas of Wright Mills, Hunter, Burnham, Ferguson, Putnam and Dye); anti-cultural elitism (the schools of critical theory and postcolonialism) and, finally, foundational discourses on education and elitism (Bourdieu, Freire and Hirsch). The chapter compares political and educational elitism and anti-elitism to establish a number of core findings, essentially opposing three types of elitism (meritocratic, plutocratic and cultural) with three types of anti-elitism (egalitarianism, Marxism and anti-cultural elitism).

Key concepts: Elitism, Sociology, Political science, Law, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Philosophies of elitism and anti-elitism — Research Paper | ScholarLens