2021Unpublished venueRequires access

Cultural heritage tourism

Andreas Neef

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Tourism-related land grabs and dispossession do not always come in the form of violent eviction and physical displacement of local communities. They can also take more subtle forms, such as gradual gentrification and economic and cultural displacement. This chapter examines processes of displacement and gentrification associated with (eco)cultural heritage tourism in rural and urban contexts of various world regions, including Central America, East Asia, Southeast Asia and South America. The case studies demonstrate that tourism development and historical heritage preservation constitute converging domestic political agendas that are reinforced by external agencies with western expertise and universal regimes of regulation, such as UNESCO, while Indigenous and non-indigenous people’s rights to property and adequate housing and to participation in the management of heritage sites and the benefit streams from tourism are compromised.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Tourism-related land grabs and dispossession do not always come in the form of violent eviction and physical displacement of local communities. They can also take more subtle forms, such as gradual gentrification and economic and cultural displacement. This chapter examines processes of displacement and gentrification associated with (eco)cultural heritage tourism in rural and urban contexts of various world regions, including Central America, East Asia, Southeast Asia and South America. The case studies demonstrate that tourism development and historical heritage preservation constitute converging domestic political agendas that are reinforced by external agencies with western expertise and universal regimes of regulation, such as UNESCO, while Indigenous and non-indigenous people’s rights to property and adequate housing and to participation in the management of heritage sites and the benefit streams from tourism are compromised.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Tourism-related land grabs and dispossession do not always come in the form of violent eviction and physical displacement of local communities. They can also take more subtle forms, such as gradual gentrification and economic and cultural displacement. This chapter examines processes of displacement and gentrification associated with (eco)cultural heritage tourism in rural and urban contexts of various world regions, including Central America, East Asia, Southeast Asia and South America. The case studies demonstrate that tourism development and historical heritage preservation constitute converging domestic political agendas that are reinforced by external agencies with western expertise and universal regimes of regulation, such as UNESCO, while Indigenous and non-indigenous people’s rights to property and adequate housing and to participation in the management of heritage sites and the benefit streams from tourism are compromised.

Key concepts: Tourism, Cultural heritage, Geography, Archaeology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cultural heritage tourism — Research Paper | ScholarLens