Incidence and management of cases of calcular obstructive jaundice with failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a 2-year experience
HeshamA Elmeligy, Ahmed Hazem Helmy, MohamedE Esmat, AmrM Gomaa, MahmoudA Nouh
Abstract
HeshamA Elmeligy, Ahmed Hazem Helmy, MohamedE Esmat, AmrM Gomaa, MahmoudA Nouh
Abstract
Background The ‘gold standard’ for management of gallstones is laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but there is no consensus for treatment of common bile duct stones. There is insufficient information in the literature on the practice of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in cases of endoscopically irretrievable stones. This study presents the technical aspects and results of this approach and comparing it with open common bile duct exploration (OCBDE). Aim To assess the management of the patients with calcular obstructive jaundice after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with LCBDE in comparison with OCBDE. Patients and methods A prospective randomized study was conducted for 2 years started from 2017 to 2019 in Theodor Bilharz Research Institute. A total of 600 patients with calcular obstructive jaundice underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, with failure of stone extraction in 50 patients. Of them, 30 patients underwent LCBDE and the other 20 patients underwent OCBDE. Overall, 40 patients were female and the other 10 were male. They ranged in age from 23 to 80 years old, with a mean age of 46.72 years. Results The mean postoperative hospital stay, pain score, and analgesia score were significantly short (P 0.05) but with no statistically significant difference. Conclusion LCBDE considered as a safe, efficient and preferred procedure for CBDE whenever possible.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Background The ‘gold standard’ for management of gallstones is laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but there is no consensus for treatment of common bile duct stones. There is insufficient information in the literature on the practice of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in cases of endoscopically irretrievable stones. This study presents the technical aspects and results of this approach and comparing it with open common bile duct exploration (OCBDE). Aim To assess the management of the patients with calcular obstructive jaundice after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with LCBDE in comparison with OCBDE. Patients and methods A prospective randomized study was conducted for 2 years started from 2017 to 2019 in Theodor Bilharz Research Institute. A total of 600 patients with calcular obstructive jaundice underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, with failure of stone extraction in 50 patients. Of them, 30 patients underwent LCBDE and the other 20 patients underwent OCBDE. Overall, 40 patients were female and the other 10 were male. They ranged in age from 23 to 80 years old, with a mean age of 46.72 years. Results The mean postoperative hospital stay, pain score, and analgesia score were significantly short (P 0.05) but with no statistically significant difference. Conclusion LCBDE considered as a safe, efficient and preferred procedure for CBDE whenever possible.
Key concepts: Medicine, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Gallstones, Obstructive jaundice, Common bile duct, Surgery, Randomized controlled trial, Incidence (geometry)