2021Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)Requires access

Introduction: Taking critical perspectives and using critical approaches in educational leadership

Steven J. Courtney, Helen Gunter, Richard Niesche, Tina Trujillo

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This is not just another textbook about educational leadership. This one is different because it presents and encourages thinking and analyses that are located in the critical part of the field. But what do we mean by this? Critical has many meanings that you may have come across in academic writing: for instance, when you engage critically with your sources, you evaluate and question them; when you are critical of someone's argument or approach, then it means that you have identified problems with it. We are using the word critical to mean a particular way of thinking about, and undertaking research activities connected to, concepts and practices such as "educational leadership". In this introductory chapter, we will explain what we mean by this "particular way", as well as why we think that using critical approaches is vital to understanding and explaining educational leadership. In order to do that, we need to characterize scholarship within the field that is not from a critical perspective, in other words functionalist scholarship, so that you can be clear about why this textbook is different and necessary. In this chapter we also want to tell you a little about who we are, because as we'll point out in more detail later on, taking a critical perspective means recognizing that we — our histories, dispositions and motives as authors and researchers — are integral to the analysis and arguments that we want to make. Knowing more about who we are enables you as a reader to understand why we think as we do, and so make a judgement about how credible our arguments are.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This is not just another textbook about educational leadership. This one is different because it presents and encourages thinking and analyses that are located in the critical part of the field. But what do we mean by this? Critical has many meanings that you may have come across in academic writing: for instance, when you engage critically with your sources, you evaluate and question them; when you are critical of someone's argument or approach, then it means that you have identified problems with it. We are using the word critical to mean a particular way of thinking about, and undertaking research activities connected to, concepts and practices such as "educational leadership". In this introductory chapter, we will explain what we mean by this "particular way", as well as why we think that using critical approaches is vital to understanding and explaining educational leadership. In order to do that, we need to characterize scholarship within the field that is not from a critical perspective, in other words functionalist scholarship, so that you can be clear about why this textbook is different and necessary. In this chapter we also want to tell you a little about who we are, because as we'll point out in more detail later on, taking a critical perspective means recognizing that we — our histories, dispositions and motives as authors and researchers — are integral to the analysis and arguments that we want to make. Knowing more about who we are enables you as a reader to understand why we think as we do, and so make a judgement about how credible our arguments are.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This is not just another textbook about educational leadership. This one is different because it presents and encourages thinking and analyses that are located in the critical part of the field. But what do we mean by this? Critical has many meanings that you may have come across in academic writing: for instance, when you engage critically with your sources, you evaluate and question them; when you are critical of someone's argument or approach, then it means that you have identified problems with it. We are using the word critical to mean a particular way of thinking about, and undertaking research activities connected to, concepts and practices such as "educational leadership". In this introductory chapter, we will explain what we mean by this "particular way", as well as why we think that using critical approaches is vital to understanding and explaining educational leadership. In order to do that, we need to characterize scholarship within the field that is not from a critical perspective, in other words functionalist scholarship, so that you can be clear about why this textbook is different and necessary. In this chapter we also want to tell you a little about who we are, because as we'll point out in more detail later on, taking a critical perspective means recognizing that we — our histories, dispositions and motives as authors and researchers — are integral to the analysis and arguments that we want to make. Knowing more about who we are enables you as a reader to understand why we think as we do, and so make a judgement about how credible our arguments are.

Key concepts: Sociology, Engineering ethics, Epistemology, Engineering, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Introduction: Taking critical perspectives and using critical approaches in educational leadership — Research Paper | ScholarLens