1998•Unpublished venueRequires access

Reengineering the Doctrinal Latticework of Military Space

Mickey L. Quintrall

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study examines the ability of the U.S. military community to integrate a world of satellite aided, precision guided weaponry and all seeing, all hearing space age systems with traditional terrestrial warfighting systems. This statement begs the question; does modern doctrine and the joint military culture adequately address the evolving military requirements involving all mediums of warfare? The answer lies partially with three issues facing the U.S. Department of Defense: (1) contemporary military space leadership and command organization, (2) dissonant parochial feelings among the Services, and (3) a contemporary organizational structure that better meets a changing world space threat. Certainly, space systems have become an essential component to the U.S.'s overall warfighting capability. In fact, some are saying space operations have become economic and military centers of gravity. Maybe, however, one thing is certain. The fourth medium of battlespace provides integrated capabilities that bolsters both the offense and defense of terrestrial combat components, sends resonating proof of the U.S.'s ability to sustain a global awareness, and provides global, instantaneous, secure communication to its forces. In a recent futuristic exercise, during the initial throes of combatant exchange, the United States loses in space to a China-Russian based coalition. It took weeks before space aided American C4I capabilities recovered. This monograph explores the issues that must be debated in order to keep pace with the capabilities and integration of civil, military, and international space systems, their military command and control structure, and social/psychological attitudes towards contemporary change.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study examines the ability of the U.S. military community to integrate a world of satellite aided, precision guided weaponry and all seeing, all hearing space age systems with traditional terrestrial warfighting systems. This statement begs the question; does modern doctrine and the joint military culture adequately address the evolving military requirements involving all mediums of warfare? The answer lies partially with three issues facing the U.S. Department of Defense: (1) contemporary military space leadership and command organization, (2) dissonant parochial feelings among the Services, and (3) a contemporary organizational structure that better meets a changing world space threat. Certainly, space systems have become an essential component to the U.S.'s overall warfighting capability. In fact, some are saying space operations have become economic and military centers of gravity. Maybe, however, one thing is certain. The fourth medium of battlespace provides integrated capabilities that bolsters both the offense and defense of terrestrial combat components, sends resonating proof of the U.S.'s ability to sustain a global awareness, and provides global, instantaneous, secure communication to its forces. In a recent futuristic exercise, during the initial throes of combatant exchange, the United States loses in space to a China-Russian based coalition. It took weeks before space aided American C4I capabilities recovered. This monograph explores the issues that must be debated in order to keep pace with the capabilities and integration of civil, military, and international space systems, their military command and control structure, and social/psychological attitudes towards contemporary change.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study examines the ability of the U.S. military community to integrate a world of satellite aided, precision guided weaponry and all seeing, all hearing space age systems with traditional terrestrial warfighting systems. This statement begs the question; does modern doctrine and the joint military culture adequately address the evolving military requirements involving all mediums of warfare? The answer lies partially with three issues facing the U.S. Department of Defense: (1) contemporary military space leadership and command organization, (2) dissonant parochial feelings among the Services, and (3) a contemporary organizational structure that better meets a changing world space threat. Certainly, space systems have become an essential component to the U.S.'s overall warfighting capability. In fact, some are saying space operations have become economic and military centers of gravity. Maybe, however, one thing is certain. The fourth medium of battlespace provides integrated capabilities that bolsters both the offense and defense of terrestrial combat components, sends resonating proof of the U.S.'s ability to sustain a global awareness, and provides global, instantaneous, secure communication to its forces. In a recent futuristic exercise, during the initial throes of combatant exchange, the United States loses in space to a China-Russian based coalition. It took weeks before space aided American C4I capabilities recovered. This monograph explores the issues that must be debated in order to keep pace with the capabilities and integration of civil, military, and international space systems, their military command and control structure, and social/psychological attitudes towards contemporary change.

Key concepts: Battlespace, Military doctrine, Combatant, Doctrine, Pace, Military terminology, Space (punctuation), Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reengineering the Doctrinal Latticework of Military Space — Research Paper | ScholarLens