2021Unpublished venueRequires access

Making Proof Quest Effective for An Automated Prover

Nicodemus Msafiri John Mbwambo

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The goal of software verification is to establish the correctness of a program formally. Verification of programs that involve combinations of novel and sophisticated data abstractions is a challenge because their verification typically involves mathematical domains for which there are no decision procedures. This research leverages the existing RESOLVE verifying compiler. A central piece of such a compiler is its prover. To scale up, the prover needs to instantiate and utilize appropriate theorems from arbitrary mathematical theory units. This research aims to replace the existing prototype prover with a more powerful one suitable for proving verification conditions in sequent form. The new prover uses a three-tiered searching strategy to optimize the proof quest by eliminating the exploration of unnecessary search spaces. The research uses generic maps and trees to experiment with the proposed strategy and evaluate the new prover.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The goal of software verification is to establish the correctness of a program formally. Verification of programs that involve combinations of novel and sophisticated data abstractions is a challenge because their verification typically involves mathematical domains for which there are no decision procedures. This research leverages the existing RESOLVE verifying compiler. A central piece of such a compiler is its prover. To scale up, the prover needs to instantiate and utilize appropriate theorems from arbitrary mathematical theory units. This research aims to replace the existing prototype prover with a more powerful one suitable for proving verification conditions in sequent form. The new prover uses a three-tiered searching strategy to optimize the proof quest by eliminating the exploration of unnecessary search spaces. The research uses generic maps and trees to experiment with the proposed strategy and evaluate the new prover.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The goal of software verification is to establish the correctness of a program formally. Verification of programs that involve combinations of novel and sophisticated data abstractions is a challenge because their verification typically involves mathematical domains for which there are no decision procedures. This research leverages the existing RESOLVE verifying compiler. A central piece of such a compiler is its prover. To scale up, the prover needs to instantiate and utilize appropriate theorems from arbitrary mathematical theory units. This research aims to replace the existing prototype prover with a more powerful one suitable for proving verification conditions in sequent form. The new prover uses a three-tiered searching strategy to optimize the proof quest by eliminating the exploration of unnecessary search spaces. The research uses generic maps and trees to experiment with the proposed strategy and evaluate the new prover.

Key concepts: Gas meter prover, Correctness, Computer science, Automated theorem proving, Programming language, Compiler, Proof assistant, Formal verification

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Making Proof Quest Effective for An Automated Prover — Research Paper | ScholarLens