2019SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Copyright in Street Art and Graffiti in the Netherlands

Anke Moerland, Stéphanie de Potter

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Graffiti and street art is ubiquitous – it may even be one of the fastest expanding artistic movements. According to a Dutch daily evening newspaper, the presence of graffiti and street art in Amsterdam and Rotterdam has increased significantly between 2014 and 2016. The number of square meters of graffiti on metro trains in Amsterdam alone rose by 50 % (from 6.000 to 9.000 square meters) during these years. In particular Amsterdam has become one of the most influential graffiti and street art scenes in the world: it actively hosts exhibitions of graffiti and street art. This paper explores to what extent Dutch copyright law protects street and graffiti art, and in particular how Dutch law balances the interests of street artists and property owners. We examine whether street art and graffiti are eligible for copyright protection, in particular tags, throw- ups, graffiti- style letters and more elaborate forms of street art. The moral rights of street artists are discussed in detail, and in particular whether the artists can enforce the attribution or paternity right, for example, when a photographic book includes a picture of an artwork without acknowledgment. We also discuss whether artists can invoke the integrity right to prevent: (a) the destruction of their works, for instance the whitewashing of the mural; and (b) their removal for the purposes of being exhibited and/ or offered for sale in indoor environments. Finally, copyright protection for illegally created street art and graffiti is addressed and whether the paternity and the integrity right of illegally created works can be enforced.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Graffiti and street art is ubiquitous – it may even be one of the fastest expanding artistic movements. According to a Dutch daily evening newspaper, the presence of graffiti and street art in Amsterdam and Rotterdam has increased significantly between 2014 and 2016. The number of square meters of graffiti on metro trains in Amsterdam alone rose by 50 % (from 6.000 to 9.000 square meters) during these years. In particular Amsterdam has become one of the most influential graffiti and street art scenes in the world: it actively hosts exhibitions of graffiti and street art. This paper explores to what extent Dutch copyright law protects street and graffiti art, and in particular how Dutch law balances the interests of street artists and property owners. We examine whether street art and graffiti are eligible for copyright protection, in particular tags, throw- ups, graffiti- style letters and more elaborate forms of street art. The moral rights of street artists are discussed in detail, and in particular whether the artists can enforce the attribution or paternity right, for example, when a photographic book includes a picture of an artwork without acknowledgment. We also discuss whether artists can invoke the integrity right to prevent: (a) the destruction of their works, for instance the whitewashing of the mural; and (b) their removal for the purposes of being exhibited and/ or offered for sale in indoor environments. Finally, copyright protection for illegally created street art and graffiti is addressed and whether the paternity and the integrity right of illegally created works can be enforced.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Graffiti and street art is ubiquitous – it may even be one of the fastest expanding artistic movements. According to a Dutch daily evening newspaper, the presence of graffiti and street art in Amsterdam and Rotterdam has increased significantly between 2014 and 2016. The number of square meters of graffiti on metro trains in Amsterdam alone rose by 50 % (from 6.000 to 9.000 square meters) during these years. In particular Amsterdam has become one of the most influential graffiti and street art scenes in the world: it actively hosts exhibitions of graffiti and street art. This paper explores to what extent Dutch copyright law protects street and graffiti art, and in particular how Dutch law balances the interests of street artists and property owners. We examine whether street art and graffiti are eligible for copyright protection, in particular tags, throw- ups, graffiti- style letters and more elaborate forms of street art. The moral rights of street artists are discussed in detail, and in particular whether the artists can enforce the attribution or paternity right, for example, when a photographic book includes a picture of an artwork without acknowledgment. We also discuss whether artists can invoke the integrity right to prevent: (a) the destruction of their works, for instance the whitewashing of the mural; and (b) their removal for the purposes of being exhibited and/ or offered for sale in indoor environments. Finally, copyright protection for illegally created street art and graffiti is addressed and whether the paternity and the integrity right of illegally created works can be enforced.

Key concepts: Graffiti, Visual arts, Exhibition, Newspaper, Art, Mural, Law, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Copyright in Street Art and Graffiti in the Netherlands — Research Paper | ScholarLens