2021•Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and ComplexityOpen access

Business Model Dynamics from Interaction with Open Innovation

Montserrat Peñarroya-Farell, Francesc Miralles

Open full text 67 citations

Abstract

In today's competitive environment, firms face strong challenges.We live in a volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) environment where open innovation is a strategic choice and, on top of that, the COVID-19 pandemic has emphasized most of these disrupting forces.Incumbent companies must act strategically by adapting their business model to minimize the risk and to capture the new value that emerges.This article intends to contribute to the development of the nascent stream of research that seeks to understand the evolution of Business Models through time-known as Business Model Dynamics (BMD)-and explores how to better align this evolution to the implementation settings of strategy.This exploratory study is built upon a meta-synthesis approach to identify, analyze, and clarify how academics have dealt with the three terms used in the Business Model Dynamics research strand: Business Model Innovation, Business Model Adaptation, and Business Model Evolution.The results of the meta-synthesis show that a disambiguation of concepts is necessary as, from an organizational learning point of view, it is required to provide a better connection between strategic value appropriation and changes on Business Models.This article contributes to the researcher and practitioner's literature on Business Model Dynamics offering a clear and rigorous definition of each term from a strategic point of view, thus preventing the conceptual incoherence and their reiterated wrong use as synonyms.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In today's competitive environment, firms face strong challenges.We live in a volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) environment where open innovation is a strategic choice and, on top of that, the COVID-19 pandemic has emphasized most of these disrupting forces.Incumbent companies must act strategically by adapting their business model to minimize the risk and to capture the new value that emerges.This article intends to contribute to the development of the nascent stream of research that seeks to understand the evolution of Business Models through time-known as Business Model Dynamics (BMD)-and explores how to better align this evolution to the implementation settings of strategy.This exploratory study is built upon a meta-synthesis approach to identify, analyze, and clarify how academics have dealt with the three terms used in the Business Model Dynamics research strand: Business Model Innovation, Business Model Adaptation, and Business Model Evolution.The results of the meta-synthesis show that a disambiguation of concepts is necessary as, from an organizational learning point of view, it is required to provide a better connection between strategic value appropriation and changes on Business Models.This article contributes to the researcher and practitioner's literature on Business Model Dynamics offering a clear and rigorous definition of each term from a strategic point of view, thus preventing the conceptual incoherence and their reiterated wrong use as synonyms.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 67 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In today's competitive environment, firms face strong challenges.We live in a volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) environment where open innovation is a strategic choice and, on top of that, the COVID-19 pandemic has emphasized most of these disrupting forces.Incumbent companies must act strategically by adapting their business model to minimize the risk and to capture the new value that emerges.This article intends to contribute to the development of the nascent stream of research that seeks to understand the evolution of Business Models through time-known as Business Model Dynamics (BMD)-and explores how to better align this evolution to the implementation settings of strategy.This exploratory study is built upon a meta-synthesis approach to identify, analyze, and clarify how academics have dealt with the three terms used in the Business Model Dynamics research strand: Business Model Innovation, Business Model Adaptation, and Business Model Evolution.The results of the meta-synthesis show that a disambiguation of concepts is necessary as, from an organizational learning point of view, it is required to provide a better connection between strategic value appropriation and changes on Business Models.This article contributes to the researcher and practitioner's literature on Business Model Dynamics offering a clear and rigorous definition of each term from a strategic point of view, thus preventing the conceptual incoherence and their reiterated wrong use as synonyms.

Key concepts: Value capture, Business model, Appropriation, Artifact-centric business process model, Business rule, Knowledge management, Strategic management, Business transformation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Business Model Dynamics from Interaction with Open Innovation — Research Paper | ScholarLens