The 9/11 Commission
William Walters
Abstract
William Walters
Abstract
Within the covert imaginary state secrecy is typically represented through references to barriers and boundaries and in a frame that juxtaposes secrecy and publicity. A more useful depiction might be in terms of the devices and processes by which flows of information are managed. This argument is developed in this chapter, which looks at the 9/11 Commission, the public inquiry tasked with making sense of the events of September 11. Rather than see publicity and secrecy as logically opposed practices, the chapter develops a concept of devices of dis/closure to explore how closure and disclosure work in tandem and in a mutually constitutive relationship within the public inquiry. The chapter also offers a general argument that public inquiries are a promising focus for secrecy research, not just as sources of data but opportunities to observe practices of secrecy in action.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Within the covert imaginary state secrecy is typically represented through references to barriers and boundaries and in a frame that juxtaposes secrecy and publicity. A more useful depiction might be in terms of the devices and processes by which flows of information are managed. This argument is developed in this chapter, which looks at the 9/11 Commission, the public inquiry tasked with making sense of the events of September 11. Rather than see publicity and secrecy as logically opposed practices, the chapter develops a concept of devices of dis/closure to explore how closure and disclosure work in tandem and in a mutually constitutive relationship within the public inquiry. The chapter also offers a general argument that public inquiries are a promising focus for secrecy research, not just as sources of data but opportunities to observe practices of secrecy in action.
Key concepts: Commission, Political science, Law